The current focus of discussions is more focused on actions that must be implemented after crises, rather than measures that can prevent these incidents
A is developing new regulatory guidelines with the aim of strengthening the resilience of the electrical system in the face of severe weather events. The current focus of discussions is more on actions that should be implemented after crises, rather than measures that can prevent these incidents. One of the central aspects of this discussion is afforestation, which represents a significant risk of accidents in urban areas. Responsibility for pruning and removing trees is shared between city halls and energy distributors, but there is criticism about the lack of clarity regarding these duties. Aneel’s technical note highlights that distributors have the obligation to carry out preventive actions, such as pruning trees, to ensure continuity of electricity supply.
Furthermore, Aneel proposes the implementation of an “active transparency” system, which would require distributors to inform about supply interruptions within a period of up to 15 minutes. It would also be necessary to make real-time data available on the number of consumers affected by these outages, increasing communication with the public. Another important point is the need for standardization in communication between distributors and public authorities during crises.
Aneel identified problems related to the lack of investment and the mismatch between contracts and actual deliveries. To address these challenges, the agency is considering the possibility of allowing resource sharing between distributors in emergency situations. Finally, Energy consultant Luciana Rodrigues highlights the importance of making electrical infrastructures more robust against climate phenomena. She also suggests mapping risk areas in order to avoid inadequate constructions that could worsen problems during extreme events.
Published by Sarah Paula
*Report produced with the help of AI
