The reported this Tuesday (26) that it fired , who served as Director of the Defense Resources Management Course at the Escola Superior de Guerra, after statements in which he contested the 2022 elections and the actions of the Federal Police.
Anderson Freire Barboza is a retired military officer and had been hired by the Ministry of Defense as a PTTC (Temporary Task Provider). , the Armed Forces have a contingent of 12 thousand retirees who returned to the barracks, with 30% salary bonuses and failures in transparency.
The dismissal must be made official in the edition of the Official Gazette of the Union this Wednesday (27).
the soldier posted in a group that the 2022 elections “were stolen”, called the president a thief and contested the veracity of the investigation into .
The post was made on Thursday night (21) in a WhatsApp group that brings together around 100 people, including teachers and former students of ESG — a school linked to Defense, a department headed by the minister.
On the same day earlier, the , including the former president, the former Minister of Defense, vice-president in 2022 on the defeated ticket, and the former minister of the (Institutional Security Office) Augusto Heleno.
Barboza, who is a retired colonel, begins the message by writing that “people are forgetting.”
It then says that the “elections were stolen under the leadership of “. “From the release of the thief to all the acts perpetrated in favor of Lula in the electoral race.”
The message continues and the retired colonel states that “people were outraged and a large part of the population did not accept the result”. He concludes by saying that after that, “of course, we will discuss the veracity of this investigation of facts by the PF”.
When contacted, Barboza confirmed that he made the publication. “This is an outburst, because the soldiers I know among the 37 mentioned are extremely competent professionals, which naturally generates a feeling of sadness”, he says.
“In the aforementioned group, made up mostly of civilians, lessons began to emerge without complete information being considered,” he continues. “Thus, the outburst was simply from a citizen outraged by the way some people judge without knowing all the facts, something clearly unethical. Therefore, I decided to respond in kind.”
LINK PRESENT: Did you like this text? Subscribers can access seven free accesses from any link per day. Just click the blue F below.
