Opinion is directed to the Executive Branch after Dino’s decision; text highlights the need for caution and defends a ‘safer’ interpretation of the decision
This Monday (30), the released an opinion that aims to guide the bodies of the Executive Branch in relation to the recent decision of minister Flávio Dino, from . This decision allowed the release of some parliamentary amendments that had been blocked. Although he authorized the execution of amendments already committed before the suspension, Dino maintained the ban on commission amendments totaling R$4.2 billion.
Furthermore, the minister released the commitment to health-related amendments until the end of the year and the movement of resources into funds in the area until January 10th. This measure is seen as a way to ensure that resources allocated to health can be used effectively, especially in a critical period. However, the AGU raised “reasonable doubt” about the scope of Dino’s decision, especially with regard to the commission amendments mentioned in the leaders’ letter. Given this, the AGU suggests a more cautious interpretation, which does not allow the commitment of these amendments, even if they were requested before December 23rd and are intended for health.
The AGU opinion emphasizes the need for caution when adopting this interpretation, awaiting a possible judicial clarification that could bring more clarity to the situation. This approach aims to avoid future complications and ensure that decisions taken are in accordance with current legislation.” Notwithstanding reasonable doubt, it is, at this time, prudent to adopt the safest interpretation of the decision, in the sense that, at least until further judicial clarification, the commitments of the commission amendments object of Official Letter no. 1.4335.458/2024, even if prior to 12/23/2024 and even if intended for health”, stated the document.
*Report produced with the help of AI
Posted by Victor Oliveira
