The recent crises of management () led the government base to worry about the need for an articulation of social movements and allied parties to react to the advancement of opposition and prevent the bleeding of political capital and popularity from disrupting the president’s electoral plans.
The controversy surrounding and the negative repercussion of are pointed out as problems that Lula could face without so many mishaps if he was more connected with sectors of society to assist him in the so-called political struggle, as in previous PT mandates.
According to this Monday (27), the negative assessment of the Lula government grew six points within one and a half month, reached 37% (largest numerical level in the term) and, for the first time, surpassed the positive (31%).
The management popularity melted especially in the Northeast (where the positive evaluation retreated from 48% to 37%); Among women (negative evaluation rose from 27% to 36%); Among those who completed high school (negative assessment went from 33% to 43%) and among those who earn two to five minimum wages (negative assessment went from 32% to 41%).
Leaders of organizations aligned with the government complain about the lack of a more incisive stance of the Planalto Palace in defense of guidelines that promote debate and mobilization. Government assessment, in turn, is that the strength is a choice of battles.
With, subjects such as the risk of and the memory of those came to light. Governors bet on efforts to give a way of recovering ground.
The national coordinator of (popular movements center) says it is natural that the performance of the movements is “short of the necessary”. The loss of traction was observed under other PT mandates.
“I have no problem doing self -criticism, and we are practically disjointed. Why do we leave the streets?” Asks the petista, adding that the weaknesses of the government are prior to communication.
“The government needs to make political dispute daytime, just as it did every day of its government, and so it was almost reelected. If each time it presents a proposal and comes [o deputado] Beating, the government retreats, is very complicated. “
The unprecedented governing with a hard and strongly organized opposition, after, is a warning on the left since 2022.
With the experience of impeachment, the former president (PT) that a government does not remain “without a structure of popular organization” and that the support was critical to not occur “no rupture”.
Similar warnings are made by the former minister (PT) of the hard core of the first Lula administration. In, he wrote that one of the directions for the left survival was to ensure “social support for the necessary reforms.”
The issues gained urgency with the persistence of pockets, imposing resistance to the government in certain groups, and the conservative international wave, crowned by the election of NOS.
For Bonfim, Trump’s return shows “that only institutionality is insufficient to contain the advance of the far right and fascism.” He says he must climb combative spokesmen, such as the PT leader in the House, (RJ), to spread government achievements and reheat the movements.
Using the thesis that the left was analog while the right dominated the digital sphere, the state deputy (-SP) sees Lula losing confidence among the poor. “With each unpopular measure of the government, people adhere to our speech,” says the pocketist.
The PT Secretary of Communication says that “showing that the far right is not good for the people” must be a shared task between government and party. It projects new gas for militancy with government entry in the second half and the adjustments of ministerial reform.
“We have to guide the country, and not let the opposition do it,” summarizes the federal deputy for São Paulo.
Government interlocutors argue that one of the ways to reconnect with the popular strata is to put in debate, on the streets and congress, real -life themes. And are cited as matters with potential to agglutinate forces.
Author of, the federal deputy (-SP) says that the left “needs to go back to the bases, speak the language of the people and return hope”. He also states that the government “could have been committed more” for the project.
“Perhaps the government’s opportunity is there to help give the strength that this debate deserves and throwing light on what, in fact, matters and mobilizes the working class, which is not left, right or center.”
The emptying of the flags in this area. Lula and his government have been balanced between measures for the signed portfolio slice and nods to groups that have approached the right, such as entrepreneurs and application workers.
Representatives of union movements also attribute the secondary role of the sector, compared to the first petist governments, to the shortage of financing since the government (). The main factor for the fall was.
The public fiasco at the act of May 1, 2024, in São Paulo, illustrated adversity. On stage, Lula to the Minister of the General Secretariat of the Presidency, official official for the government’s dialogue with social movements.
João Carlos Gonçalves, Juruna, Secretary-General of Força Sindical, says that Lula 3 management remains in debt with the workers because “it has not debated the social rights that were removed”, but emphasizes that the segment maintains bridges for finding openness to the dialogue.
Juruna criticizes the conciliation strategy with right wing. “The government must have the audacity to launch popular proposals, which won Brazilians, and let Congress refuse if you think it is the case. If you make only agreement and articulation, we will never get out of the difficulty.”
