The federal deputy and national president of the (Workers Party), owes the ministerial reform that the president prepares for the coming weeks, after the election for the presidents of the House and.
The portfolio is responsible for articulating different segments of civil society, such as social movements and youth.
This Thursday (30), Lula, but avoided announced it, saying that there is nothing defined yet.
At the head of the PT since 2017, the federal deputy for Paraná was a senator for the same state and headed the Civil House during the first term of former President Dilma Rousseff (PT). In the current government, Gleisi accumulates criticism of the decisions of important PT members, such as ministers.
Remember moments when she publicly showed her disapproval.
PT’s performance in 2024 municipalities was a reason for. Commenting on the results, the Minister of Institutional Relations said the party has not yet left the “relegation zone that entered 2016”.
Gleisi the co -religionist and said Padilha needed to “refresh his memory” about what has been happening to the PT in recent years.
“Offending the party, making fun and decreasing our national effort does not contribute to altering this correlation of forces. Padilha should focus on the political articulations of the government, which helped reach these results,” he added.
In addition, Gleisi took the opportunity to demonstrate his dissatisfaction with the composition of government forces, saying that the PT “pays the price, as a party, of being in a government of wide coalition.” , and the overall guidance was to put “hot cloths.”
‘Austericide’ tax and spending cut
Some economic measures of the minister, such as the fiscal framework, were targeted by criticism within the PT, and Gleisi chorus.
A resolution, approved by the party’s National Directory in December 2023, called the spending containment policy, which would also be attributed to the “Independent BC Dictatorship.”
At the time, Gleisi denied that the critique of the document was directed to the executive members, but argued that the country cannot be guided by fiscal austerity. She came to (gross domestic product).
A also generated criticism within the PT. The manifesto “Financial Market and Media cannot dictate the rules of the country”, supported by PDT, PSOL and PC of B, was read by some petistas as an attack on the government.
The state deputy (-SP) sent a message to internal PT groups criticizing the fact that the party signed a manifesto against the, which was still in the elaboration phase. He stated that the decision was made without internal consultation.
“By the time President Lula defines the course, and we trust him a lot, the PT will not miss him. We will be together,” said Gleisi, reaffirming that it was not a critique of the executive.
Clash with Haddad and Succession of Lula
PT President and Finance Minister Fernando Haddad differ on the relationship between fiscal deficit and economic growth. , is the political dispute over the economic path that President Lula should follow to seek his reelection or elect a successor.
The succession alone was a source of divergence between Gleisi and Haddad. In interviews with the newspaper O Globo, both gave different answers when asked who will succeed President Lula in 2026 or 2030.
The president of the PT said he found the discussion “extemporaneous”. What will ensure Lula’s succession and reelection, according to her, is to make “everything works out.” Haddad, in turn, said the successor “will be” in the next election, suggesting that the issue should already be addressed.
BC Succession
During Haddad’s vacation, Gleisi also attacked with the interim farm minister, Dario Duringan. He argued that the exchange of the presidency of the Central Bank (Central Bank) should be done “without a political rash.”
In a post on X (former Twitter), the PT president showed her dissatisfaction with the speech of Haddad’s substitute.
“It was the popular vote that gave President Lula the prerogative of appointing the next president of the BC. There is no need to talk about political arrice in this decision, much less fantasizing than the management of the BC ‘Independent’ was ‘technical’,” he said.
