Nikolas Ferreira by Video about Pix “;” Government evaluates criminally processing those who publicize fake news about Pix “;” Bolsonaro says he will sue Haddad after talks about pix crisis “;” Boulos says he will sue Nikolas Ferreira for fake news about inspection from Pix “;” Bruno Dantas threatens journalist after commenting on acting at TCU “.
“Pablo Marçal threatens to sue journalist in a live interview”; “He says he will sue Marçal for injury”; “Bolsonaro says he will sue Lula for speaking about US mansion”; “Boulos says he will sue Marçal about a case involving the same name”; “He says he will sue PT people for ‘threats’.”
“Janja says he will sue ‘x’ after attack hacker”; “says he will sue Gustavo Gayer for fake news”; “Yasmin Brunet says he will sue doctors after criticism and speculation about his appearance”; “Thor Batista says he will sue who attacked him on the internet”; “Suzana Vieira says she will sue who to speak ill of her”; threatens to process who calls you old. “
The sequence of recent headlines mixes very different political, legal and personal clashes. Some caricatures, some endowed with perhaps respectable legal argument, the calls keep in common the choice for public theatricalization of the legal threat.
The instinct of the threat, which is rarely consummated in legal action and is only in the message, gives important signs about a lot. It is not only indicated by declaratory journalism, one devoid of a fact relevant or analysis, and eager to report frivolous statement. It is not only demonstrated the precariousness of non -violent communication to succeed in an environment defined by belligerence and incivility.
Not only does it demonstrate a moment to use the right to intimidate, or the belief that conflicts can be overcome by the threat of process. Not only reveals the ignorance of many people who, by drawing the weapon of “I will sue you”, may be accused of threat crime: “threaten someone, by word, written or gesture, or any other symbolic means, to cause you unfair and serious evil “(art. 147 of). Will be subject to the unpredictable judicial interpretation of the meaning of “unfair and serious evil.”
This choir of threats may be a symptom of social and legal pathology that intensifies in our time. Verbal and pre-judicial lawfare, a kind of informal judicialization of public discourse, needs to be better known, its most well researched causes and effects.
It is not enough to process, you have to threaten before. The phenomenon is not confused with judicialization or predatory litigation, which instrumentalizes justice to violate the law, or uses the judiciary as a weapon for spurious purposes. Pre-judicial lawfare uses the media threat, pure and simple, as a weapon. It is also a form of predation and trivialization of law.
As long as the judiciary does not offer a doctrinal and procedural output to counteract the eventual abuse of law, or the eventual crime of threat, we will be increasingly subjected to this ridiculous joke: “Wow, wow, so you kill me, if I process you , oh, oh if I process you “.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
