The minister of the (Federal Supreme Court) released the transfers of parliamentary amendments to five more organizations prevented from receiving resources due to lack of transparency. According to the rapporteur, they were again allowed to receive funds after disclosing easily accessible transparency pages with information about the amendments that they are beneficiaries.
The release occurred after the submission of technical notes by (Comptroller General of the Union) informing the change.
The measure involves the Londrina Cancer Institute, the Faculty of Medicine Foundation, the Finatec (Foundation of Scientific and Technological Enterprises), the Development Support Foundation of the Federal University of Pernambuco and the Praxis Institute of Education, Culture and Social Assistance.
Dino settled five days for the Executive Power to withdraw from the register of inidotes and prevented from entering into agreements or receive transfers from the Public Administration. Ministries should also be informed that there is no impediment to new transfers.
Four other entities that partially complied with the transparency rules began to meet the requirements and will follow without restrictions to receive transfers. They are the Brotherhood of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Santos, the Institute of Incubation and Acceleration (IA), the BR Arte Instituto and Avante Brasil Eventos, training, scientific and technological innovation projects.
On January 3, Dino who did not provide detailed information about what they received during the year.
The transparency of the NGOs was the target of Audit of CGU. The agency evaluated whether organizations disclose on the Internet, “in an affordable, clear, detailed and complete manner, the receipt and execution of resources”.
So far, 12 of them have had the transfers released. Two other organizations that had incomplete information had the transfers suspended on Monday (3) because they stopped detailing the amounts received and the purpose given to them.
Of the 26 entities analyzed, half did not present the data correctly, while another 9 showed incomplete information and 4 promoted “transparency of information properly,” according to the controllership.
In the same decision, the rapporteur summoned the parties of the process to deal with transparency in the payment of amendments to the 27th. The rapporteur called the moment of conciliation and contextualization hearing, when he should discuss and monitor the measures taken to ensure transparency and the tracking of amendments.
Dino summoned representatives of AGU (Attorney General of the Union), the law firm and the PGR (Attorney General’s Office) and PSOL, author of the action. The TCU (Federal Court of Audit) and CGU were also invited, as well as the Ministries of Planning and Budget and Management and Innovation in Public Services and the Secretariat of Institutional Relations.
Flávio Dino and the Supreme Court have heard, in recent days, the House and Senate, (Republicans-PB) and (Brazil-AP Union) indicating the relationship of distrust between the institutions around the amendment debate.
Dino mentioned the separation between the powers in the call and stated that the Supreme has sought respect for ceilings and limits to parliamentary amendments. “The independence of each power cannot overcome the borders demarcated by the Constitution, under the final interpretation of the Supreme Court,” said the minister.
In the order, the rapporteur included a list of questions to which executive and legislature bodies must answer. The questions revolve around knowing the internship of the determined transparency measures, which institutions are monitoring and controlling the execution of amendments and technical details on resource -related data dissemination.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
