The president of, (-PB), said on Friday (7) that were an “unimaginable aggression” to institutions, but cannot be classified as an attempt to coup.
In an interview with a radio from Paraíba, where the parliamentarian meets schedules on Friday, Motta was asked about and what would be his personal opinion about the subject.
“What happened cannot be admitted to happen again. It was an aggression to the institutions, an unimaginable aggression, no one imagined that it could happen,” said the deputy.
“Now I want to say it was a coup. The blow has to have a leader, it has to have a person encouraging, support from other interested institutions, such as the Armed Forces, and did not have it,” said Motta.
“There were vandals there, rods who wanted, with the uncomfortable of the outcome of the election, to demonstrate their revolt. Thinking that it could perhaps the non -continuation of the president’s mandate. And Brazil was very happy in the answer, the institutions positioned themselves from Very firmly, “he said.
Second, hosts of the three powers on January 8, 2023 was an act of vandalism for most Brazilians, 65%. To 30%, the acts were an attempt to coup.
For the rapporteur of the case in the Supreme, minister, the nature of what happened on January 8 was, while politicians of the pockets seek to blame the protesters, qualifying them of vandals subject to an exacerbated legal framework.
In this Friday’s interview, Motta stated that there is “a certain imbalance” in the penalties given by the Federal Supreme Court () to those convicted of the scammers, albeit without mentioning the Supreme. He stated that it is necessary to punish people who depreciated public assets, but without committing exaggeration.
“You can’t penalize a lady who spent there in front of the palace, did nothing, did not throw a stone and receive 17 years of penalty for closed regime. There is a certain imbalance in this. We have to punish the people who went there, broke, They depreciated. These need to be punished.
Motta was elected president last Saturday (1st) with 444 votes and support from parties ranging from PT de Lula to De.
In the interview on Friday, the parliamentarian said that the theme of the amnesty of January 8 generates tensioning with the judiciary and the executive and therefore will be “care” by him to deal with the project.
“I can’t say that I’m going to guide next week or that I won’t be guided at all. It’s a theme that we are digesting, talking, because the dialogue has to be constant. Everyone who supported me knew that I had the support of both [PL e PT]. It cannot be required for me to ‘break down’ my performance, because I can’t be incorrect with anyone. It is up to me to be correct with everyone and conduct the house with exemption. “]
Hugo Motta also indicated that a possible path could be dialogue with the judiciary to “find a way out” for the bill.
