Newly deposed president of after a campaign marked by silence on controversial themes, (-PB) gave interviews in his first week ahead of the position in which he indicated sympathy to government-criticized guidelines (PT).
Among these themes are, AEA PEC (Proposed Amendment to the Constitution) of the.
He also charged the petista management in relation to the conduct of the economy incisively, said that Congress will not admit projects that raise the taxation and that the government needs to show more responsibility with the efficiency of spending.
The deputy was elected for the position on the 1st, among 513 members of the House, with the support of the PT of Lula and the de, the two largest benches of the house.
Regarding the bill that provides amnesty to those arrested for attacks on the headquarters of powers in 2023, Motta said in an interview on Friday (7) to Radio Arapuan FM, from Paraíba, which was a “aggression to institutions”, but not It was an attempt to blow.
He also stated that he sees “a certain imbalance” in the penalties imposed by the (Federal Supreme Court) on some of those involved. “There can not be a lady who spent there in front of the Planalto Palace, but did nothing, did not throw a stone, receive 17 years of penalty for closed regime,” he argued.
Still, Motta said it was a personal position and cannot commit to put the so -called amnesty PL among voting priorities. According to him, this will depend on the evolution of negotiations between the leaders of the house.
The positioning of the parliamentarian was similar in relation to the revision of the Clean Record Law proposed by Bolsonaro allies who want the former president to be a candidate in 2026.
One reduces from eight to two years the period of ineligibility of politicians convicted of abuse of political or economic power and misuse of the media. The former president, who is ineligible until 2030 by decision of the (Superior Electoral Court), would be contemplated by change.
Motta told CNN Brazil on Tuesday that eight years of ineligibility is a deadline that covers four elections in Brazil and, therefore, “is an extensive time” in politics —or “an eternity”, as he defined for the radio of your state.
Still, he said he is not committed to guiding the bill to change the law and that colleagues who have to bring their arguments to convince others in the college of leaders and the house plenary.
Regarding the PEC that provides for, Motta said in an interview with GloboNews on Tuesday that it is favorable to the discussion, although it has no urgency to start the process. Three days later, the PEC was filed in the House with signatures of 179 deputies – the necessary 171.
Motta said on Friday (7), in Agenda in Paraíba, that the house should discuss the theme of semi -presidentialism because there is “an interest in the house and the parties”.
“Discussing Brazil’s political system is always good to seek more efficiency, more popular participation and always seek governments for more results for a population that needs.” He pointed out, however, that the application of change should not be thought of for 2026 or 2030, as it would be “very difficult to approve.”
All Motta’s nods to these guidelines have generated negative reactions of Lula government allies.
In his interviews, the new mayor was more incisive at times when he demanded a commitment of petista management to fiscal balance.
He said that the country today lives “challenging economic scenario much because of the decisions” of the current administration and that the house will not vote for new projects that aim to increase government collection, which needs to review the quality of public spending.
“The feature is coming in, but coming out too much. The secret is not, and the government needs to understand this, how much it gets, but how much you spend. Because if you have no responsibility in public spending, you can increase the revenue Every week it will not be enough, “he said.
“The President [Lula] It will not arrive strong to compete for reelection in 2026 if the economy has no stability. To have this, you need to change the direction of decisions. I think the party presidents, especially the center, are looking at this scenario, “he added.
