Five of () and which can make it ineligible for eight years are ready for sentence in the first instance of the.
The responsible judge has already ended the evidence production phase, and the parties sent their final allegations in both the processes dealing with two video actions in which Marçal asked for a donation of R $ 5,000 in exchange for recordings of support for candidates across the country .
In the process, the electoral judge Antonio Maria Patiño Zorz, the same, denied several requirements made by the parties, as well as the hearing of witnesses of the defense. With this, it is possible that the sentence can be published at any time.
HAS Sheet Lawyer Paulo Hamilton, who represents Marçal in the actions, said they “are already mature to judge” and that there was no illicit on the part of the then candidate.
“The actions are instructed, we present final allegations. The defense is quiet about the result, since there is no fact or act that configures electoral illicit,” he said.
Called AIJE (Electoral Judicial Investigation Action), this type of procedure involves the judgment on whether there was abuse of power in the campaign or the so -called “improper use of the media”.
If Marçal is convicted in any of these cases, it will be appealed to the second instance, in the case to TRE-SP (Regional Electoral Court of São Paulo), and later the (Superior Electoral Court).
The way Marçal sent his campaign on the networks.
In the target of three of the actions now ready for trial is the structure to, with at least dozens of profiles spreading their image on social networks.
The main one was proposed by the former candidate’s party, and resulted in the suspension of profiles used by the candidate until the end of the election.
First, the Electoral Public Prosecution Service even asked the PSB action to be extinguished, claiming to be identical, which the judge denied.
In the process, Marçal denies that he has paid for electoral cuts and speaks in misuse of his name by third parties. Among other arguments, it also questions the format of the evidence presented.
The PSB argues in its allegations that there is enough evidence to recognize abuse and says that evidence reveals the existence “of a large scheme of people to produce content cuts (without any thematic restriction)”.
A third action undergoing jointly was presented by councilwoman Silvia Ferraro () of the feminist bench, who also addresses video cuts, as well as digital announcements.
Two other actions processed jointly – a PSB and another by the campaign of then candidate Guilherme Boulos (PSOL) – Marçal’s request from all over the country in exchange for a support video.
According to the authors, Marçal sought not to receive a donation, but the consideration for a product, which would consist the illicit.
Marçal’s defense argues that the video mentioned was aired for a few hours and points out that, in cases where there was transfer via Pix, the values were returned.
If convicted in any of these actions, Marçal may be declared ineligible for eight years from the date of the claim in which the conduct considered illicit occurred.
As last year the vote was on October 6, while in 2032 it will be on the 3rd, in the event that the conviction transit in res judicata, he could only return to elections in 2034, when state and national claims will occur.
While in its horizon the possibility of being declared ineligible, Marçal comes if, which has even surrendered.
In announcing inscriptions for his mentoring “the worst year of his life” – the same one that is over – Marçal announces that this is the “last chance” to participate.
“Because in 2026 I will not be focusing only on my growth, but of more than 210 million Brazilians,” he says on the site, which charges almost $ 3,000 for the package.
With the strategy of gaining evidence on controversies and seeking to surf as a right -wing candidate and antisystem, Marçal, reiterating conduct already deemed unlawful.
The apex of this pattern of behavior was less than 48 hours from the first round ,.
Such an act, however, was not the target of his opponents in any electoral action that could make Marçal ineligible, as is the case with the Aijes. Still, the PSB cited the case in its final allegations and argues that it should be considered in the gravity analysis of the facts.
Boulos’s campaign presented a criminal news for the episode. For now, that, like the São Paulo Criminalistics Institute ,.
The progress of the case in court now depends on a complaint from the prosecutor.
In addition, there is a process of electoral proposal proposed by Boulos in proceedings and can generate a fine.
