Petist leaders saw the recent nods of the new president of, (-PB), the friendly guidelines for opposition to the government as an attempt to counterbalance the speech in which he said he will not admit flies with the dictatorship and referred to the movie. “
The assessment of the president’s allies is that Motta perceived the negative repercussion in part of the right -wing right to his (in which he quoted the word “democracy”) and, in an attempt to compensate, made partial concessions to flags as changes in law of law Clean record.
For petistas heard by Sheetthe pendular movement to wave to the government and the opposition will be constant in the management of Motta, which, in their assessment ,.
Therefore, they say, there is no reason for crisis with the new commander of the house, although they consider it important to highlight that they disagree with their interpretation of the event.
Jilmar Tatto (SP), national secretary of communication, says that the mayor tries “a mediation there” and that the governors should get used to the “one in the clove, the other in the horseshoe”.
“He already said it was unacceptable and undemocratic what happened on 8/1. I think it is 1-1. In the previous management [na presidência de Arthur Lira (PP-AL)]We always lost 1-0. Better. It will not change anything about the amnesty, he will not move a straw, “says Tatto.
This interpretation is repeated by other petistas on a reserved basis.
Rogério Correia (MG) states that Motta has told the petistas that amnesty is not his agenda and is not of interest to the country. “You have to see the content of the interview, apparently he said it was a personal opinion, in my view totally wrong,” says the deputy.
“We trust what he told us and, with the denunciation of [Procuradoria-Geral da República] that will come soon, and the beginning of the trial by the [Supremo Tribunal Federal]the sensible will be to wait for the result. It is certainly what Congress will do, in respect of the democratic process and its powers. “
PT leader in the House, (RJ) says that it also considers that Motta made “error of assessment of the facts of history” by addressing the attacks of 8/1.
For Farias, Motta needs to take into account the event chain involving meetings of the former president (PL) and ministers in the Planalto Palace to deal with reactions to a scenario of defeat to Lula in 2022, the presentation of the scam to commanders. of the Armed Forces and the elaboration of an alleged plan to kill STF Minister Alexandre de Moraes, Lula and Geraldo Alckmin, among other points.
Before being elected to the presidency of the Chamber on the 1st, among 513 members of the House, Motta avoided giving interviews to the press and, not to generate noise with the PT and the two largest benches of the house.
The text has been in a special committee since last year.
In an interview on Friday (7) to Radio Arapuan FM, from Paraíba, Motta said that the acts of January 8 were “an aggression to institutions”, but that “coup has to have a leader, has to have a person encouraging, Support from other interested institutions, such as the Armed Forces, and did not have it. “
He also stated that he sees “a certain imbalance” in the penalties imposed by the Supreme to some of those involved. “There can not be a lady who spent there in front of the Planalto Palace, but did nothing, did not throw a stone, receive 17 years of penalty for closed regime,” he argued.
Still, Motta said it was a personal position and cannot commit to put the PL of amnesty among voting priorities. According to him, this will depend on the evolution of conversations and negotiations with the leaders of the house.
The attacks on January 8 were based on members of the coup camp erected in front of the Army’s headquarters in Brasilia shortly after Bolsonaro’s defeat to Lula in the 2022 election. The camps were kept in the country under the former president’s encouragement, the financing of pockets and the connivance of the Armed Forces.
Motta’s position on the amnesty project was similar to the one adopted in relation to the revision of the Clean Record Law proposed by Bolsonaro allies who want the former president to be a candidate in 2026.
It reduces from eight to two years the period of ineligibility of politicians convicted of abuse of political or economic power and misuse of the media. The former president, who is ineligible until 2030 by decision of the Superior Electoral Court, would be contemplated by change.
Motta told CNN Brazil on Tuesday that eight years of ineligibility is a deadline that covers four in Brazil and, therefore, considers it to be “extensive time” in politics-or “an eternity”, as he defined for the radio of your state.
Still, he said he is not committed to guiding the bill to change the law and that colleagues who have to bring their arguments to convince others in the college of leaders and the house plenary.
