President’s allies () estimate that it makes it clear that the problems were not only linked to the area of communication, but reflect a more structural issue.
This situation, cite members of the government, places in the focus of the pressures the ministers (House) and (farm). And so there are requests for a large shake in the government, in the words of an ally.
The perception is also that the low popularity recorded in the Datafolha survey this Friday (14) was greatly impacted by the increase of food prices and the PIX crisis.
Although not the direct responsibility of the Federal Government, the crisis in public security also splashes in the assessment of the president, according to its employees.
The survey showed that Lula’s approval collapsed in two months from 35% to 24%, reaching an unprecedented level for the petista in his three passages through the Planalto Palace. The disapproval is also a record from 34% to 41%.
They think the government regulates 32%, compared to 29% last December, when it had done so.
Some government members, however, believe that the government will have the courage to now promote the necessary changes and the reading of the scenario to react to the moment. And besides, they mention that some foci of wear are being circumvented, with the forecast of improvement in inflation, with the fall of the dollar and the prospect of a superfin-with impact on food price.
“President Lula has the humility and experience necessary to read and the strength and vigor proper to react and move what has to be moved in the second half of the game. Falling, with work, without tricks or juggling, “said Institutional Relations Minister Alexandre Padilha.
Another ally of Lula in Congress states that the research date was especially bad because it is a beginning of the year – when people, as a rule, have more accounts to pay and feel even more the impacts of inflation. He adds that without elections this year, the government will be able to resume its breath and reverse the fall of popularity.
PT leader in the House of Representatives, Lindbergh Farias (RJ) claims to be necessary for greater political dispute and emphasis on the popular agenda.
“We will turn. There has been an important drop among our voters. It is easier to recover. The government has very good numbers. The economy has grown over 3%, income has grown 11%, unemployment has been the smallest since 2012. this as the government’s realization. “
Without mentioning Haddad’s name, Lindbergh states that the government’s agenda is not dictated by Faria Lima, in a mention of the financial market. “We have to make more political dispute, show the differences with the previous government. And focus 2025 in a popular agenda that touches people’s lives. The agenda is not from Faria Lima.”
He says that the announcement of, the proposal are good examples of an agenda that dialogues with the population. “I’m sure Lula traveling the country becomes this game in 2025,” he says.
In the words of an ally, the speech is over that the government is good, but actions do not reach the people. Haddad’s image wear as a defender of unpopular measures also weighs. The agenda of the Ministry of Finance, they say, should not represent the face of the government.
In absolute reserve, allies also include the overexposure of the first lady, Rosângela Silva, A, and the insistence on identity guidelines between the causes of the fall of popularity.
The opposition, on the other hand, celebrated the results of the research. Lula’s former ally and now one of the opposition leaders, Senator Ciro Nogueira (PP-PI) writes that the popularity rate reflects the president’s confrontation stance.
“Datafolha expresses in numbers in Newton’s 3rd law, the action and reaction. Who passed the last two acting against others, reaps contrary. The most bitter Lula of the 3 is the most rejected of all squid. Action and reaction” , wrote on a social network.
The leader of the opposition in the House, Colonel Zucco (PL-RS), took advantage of the president’s approval to reinforce the call for the impeachment request of the petista, summoned by pockets in March.
“The recent Datafolha poll that reaffirms the escalation of the unpopularity of the Lula administration demonstrates that this management has come to an end,” he said.
This is the first survey of the institute measuring the approval of the current administration, after the exchange in command of the communication area, always pointed as one of the focus of the problem.
Last month, the publicist assumed Secom (Secretariat of Social Communication of the Presidency), in (RS).
The new minister took over with some plans to improve government communication, which were released during a ministerial meeting on January 20.
He asked the ministries to survey projects and actions, which can be prominently disclosed. He also indicated that he intends to use the president’s figure a lot, which he pointed out to be a “excellent” product because of his charisma and historical.
Sidonius also asked ministers to centralize the actions in the Planalto and to tune the speeches to avoid giving ammunition to the opposition.
Even with the new guidelines, the beginning of the year was marked by a series of controversies and foci of wear for the government. The first of these was the so -called Pix Crisis, when the IRS issued a standard that expanded the inspection of individual transactions with this mechanism.
forcing the government to retreat from the measure.
The government also brought to itself a new crisis with the issue of food price. The president had charged his ministers for measures to face this problem during the ministerial meeting, in particular Carlos Fávaro (agriculture) and Paulo Teixeira (agrarian development).
The first noise happened when the minister said that.
The word “intervention” is often associated with measures such as tabulation and price control, so there was a market reaction. Rui Costa then granted an interview to clarify and suggested to all change the word “intervention” for “measures” to avoid communication noise.
The same minister later became the target of criticism on social networks, suggesting that.
