Banco do Brasil, the National Superintendence of Supplementary Social Security (Previc) and the BANCO DO BRASIL EMPLOYEE Welfare Fund (Previ) received a series of questions from the unit specializing in public banks and financial regulators of the Federal Court of Auditors (TCU).
The questions are part of.
Auditors – who started work on February 10 – want to know from Previ, for example, what measures have been adopted to reduce volatility and protect the fund.
Another question has to do with the “passive immunization” strategy, which can reduce exposure in variable income.
One more point to be clarified is about the.
And when there is no consensus, if the matter has indeed been taken to the Deliberative Council. Officially the president has no veto power, no tiebreaker.
The audit is conducted by the technical area, which then forwards the result to the rapporteur of the case, Minister Walton Alencar. After that, the document will be analyzed in plenary.
and the processes involving the entity’s decision making related to the investment of its resources. ”
The idea is to map “potential risks”, given “the many harmful examples already occurred in the sector”.
. It generates a total of R $ 270 billion in investments, according to August data from the Brazilian Association of Closed Complementary Pension Entities (Abrapp).
In total, there are 84 thousand employees of the Banco do Brasil Participants, and 109,000 beneficiaries.
Removal
The TCU also received a request for removal from the function. The representation was made by Deputy Captain Alberto Neto (PL-AM).
The case is under the rapporteur of Minister Aroldo Cedraz, with no date to be analyzed.
Otherwise
CNN contacted Banco do Brasil and Previc, but has no return yet.
After the decision of the TCU to open the audit, a. The entity stated that there was great volatility in 2024, but there is no “risk of equation, nor the payment of extraordinary contributions by the associates or Banco do Brasil (BB)”.
“With respect to the members, Previ clarifies that although 2024 has presented great volatility, the plans remain in balance – much because of the good result of 2023, also built by the current management.”
A CNN He contacted Previ to find out if he received the questions from TCU. So far there has been no answer.
. They are:
- In an interview with “Valor Econômico”, President João Fukunaga attributed the opening of an audit by the Federal Court of Audit (TCU) to “a political movement that seeks to attack its management,” according to the newspaper. Why did the president make this statement? Who is ahead of this political movement? Is Minister Walton Alencar (rapporteur of the TCU case) part of this movement? TCU ministers? The Technical Unit of the Court? Does the president doubt the technical character of the audit?
- Why was there losses of $ 14 billion in 2024?
- To avoid these losses, did not constitute locks or protection mechanisms for the investments of its beneficiaries?
- One of the reasons for the loss of $ 14 billion was the concentration of the portfolio in Vale actions. And one of the reasons for the fall of Vale’s actions in 2024 was the information that the government would be evaluating the nomination of former minister Guido Mantega for a strategic position in the mining company. Why did PREVI (which is a shareholder of Vale) never positioned itself?
- Despite the fall in Selic, over 2024, interest rates continued above 5-6% in real terms. Why did PREVI concentrate its portfolio so strongly in variable income when fixed income would guarantee such a high return?
