The Attorney General of the Republic, denounced to the (Supreme Court), on Tuesday (18), the former president () on charges of leading a coup plot to prevent the inauguration of () in 2022.
Crimes of armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against the union’s assets and, finally, deterioration of listed assets.
Gonet says that he led the supposed criminal organization and even had a ready speech when there was the stroke of the coup.
A and that there are no elements in the play of the (Attorney General’s Office) that connects it to the “narrative built” in the document.
Check out some of the main statements of the Attorney General in the complaint:
1) The accusation maintains that the coup plot, allegedly led by Bolsonaro, developed in phases and had antecedents that help to explain it. The goal, however, was always the same.
The crimes described are not of instant occurrence, but unfold in a chain of events, some with more remarkable visibility than others, always articulated to the same goal – the organization, having the then President of the Republic Jair Bolsonaro, Power, or returns to it, by force, threatened or exercised, contrary to the determined result of popular will at the polls
2) Gonet narrates in the denunciation that there was an articulation to make it acceptable and even the use of force in the face of an electoral setback to Bolsonaro. The movement consisted of shooting hateful words, especially against authorities.
The articulation for this purpose involved naming words of hatred, especially in an internet environment, against characters in the country’s institutional life identified as enemies of the group, especially those who had the task of directing the elections and ensuring the normality of the process
3) According to the PGR, despite the security evidence of the electoral system, there were attempts to discredit it, such as the claim that Bolsonaro would have won the 2018 elections in the first round.
Sometimes insistent narratives would not resist a simple scrutiny of common sense
Thus, for example, to get rid of the paradox of the Bolsonaro President to overcome the 2018 elections following the electoral method, object of his inventives, he repeats, as in an uncritical mantra, which, in fact, he would have won the suffrage already in the first round, being the second round caused by gimmicks of computer fraud
The idea was propagated, even if the question was raised, in a timely manner, over the reason for the second round in favor of the opponent not to be framed.
4) The accusation says that even after a report confirmed the integrity of the 2022 electoral process, narratives and distortions of data would have been created to maintain the militancy willing to accept violent solutions against the constitutional order.
Malicious narratives were generated, based on data misrepresentation or in open untruths. The intention was to maintain the militancy passionate and willing to accept solutions of violence to the constitutional order
5) The Attorney General later reports the feeling in the face of the revelations that there was a coup plan that included the possible death of Lula and Geraldo Alckmin, besides that of STF Minister Alexandre de Moraes.
Stunning facts were discovered in investigating the events that followed the result of the elections
Investigations revealed terrifying operation of execution of the coup, even admitted to the death of the President of the Republic and the vice-president of the Republic, as well as that of Supreme Court Minister
6) The complaint says that the army was the target of a conspiracy, with the accused seeking their participation in the coup, and that those who resisted faced personal and family attacks.
It is observed that the army itself was the victim of conspirata. His participation in the coup was the subject of constant demand and provocation by the accused
General officers who resisted the instances of the sedicious suffered systematic and insidious public campaign of personal attacks, which were even addressed to family members
Continuous moral aggressions were always in the purpose of impeling them to the rebellious movement, as well as inducing effect that other military personnel, stuffed by the degenerate feeling of patriotism that the criminal organization was served, formed with the insurgents
7) Gonet argues that the crimes of coup and violent abolition of the democratic rule of law speak of attacks against democratic institutions and, therefore, deal with the attempt to attack, not the realization of the coup.
Crime was there. Both art. 359-L as art. 359-M of the Penal Code typify attack against democratic institutions, so the attempt, even the acacian truth that consummate blows do not give rise to the punishment of the victorious. The attempt is the punishable fact described in the law
8) According to the accusation, articulated maneuvers undermined constitutional powers, inciting violence against democratic institutions by aggressive pronouncements and virtual attacks, and there was no success due to the lack of support from the Army’s high command.
The targets chosen by the criminal organization were not violently “neutralized” due to the lack of support from the Army High Command to the coup decree, which expressly predicted interference measures in constitutional powers
9) The complaint is reported that Bolsonaro had a speech ready to be recited when the former president made the coup d’état, which is used by Gonet to reinforce the accusation.
The speech found in the room of Jair Messias Bolsonaro reinforces his domain over the actions of the criminal organization, especially about what would be the outcome of the plans outlined – his authoritarian permanence in power, using the use of force
10) The PGR states that the alleged criminal organization had control over undemocratic manifestations in Brazil and that the central core was in constant dialogue with popular leaders, with direction acts
The tragic result of the events of January 8, whose scammer has already been based by the Federal Supreme Court, therefore cannot be dissociated from the willful omissions of these reported characters
