() made a post on Friday (21) proposing to his followers in the X (former Twitter) to ask artificial intelligence if judges can participate in award-winning allegations, suggesting an error in the performance of the Minister of (Supreme Court), who conducted The denunciation of, a former joint of orders from the former president.
When the question was asked on artificial intelligence platforms by SheetHowever, the tools brought results that can go against Bolsonaro’s critical intent. The search for complex IAS themes, alert experts, is not recommended as it can generate errors and incomplete.
Bolsonaro’s post occurs in the context of intensifying criticism of the politician to Moraes after it on Tuesday (18) on the charges of leading a coup plot to prevent the inauguration of the president (). With the complaint of the PGR (Attorney General of the Republic), Bolsonaro approaches the possibility of becoming a defendant in the criminal action.
He is accused of the crimes of attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law and coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against the union’s assets, deterioration of overturned assets and participation in a criminal organization.
The former president, who denies having participated in the plot, can be sentenced to more than 40 years in prison for the crimes. Because of the scenario, he and allies intensified criticism of Mauro Cid’s denunciation and authorities who investigate the crimes.
Bolsonaro wrote on the social network: “An invitation to the debate. How about writing the sentence: ‘Can the judge participate in the hearings held during the award -winning denunciation?’ in chatgpt “.
Despite Bolsonaro’s critical intention implicit in the search suggestion, a research with the question elaborated by him, made by Sheet In ChatgPT, it brought as a result that a judge can participate in the hearings, with the exception that his performance needs to be “careful and respect the principles of due process of law.”
“During the hearing, the judge may intervene to ensure that the procedure is conducted fairly and transparently, but it is important that his participation does not compromise the impartiality of the case’s future judgment,” the AI response said.
The same question was asked by Sheet to Chatbot Deepseek. Similarly, the tool said judges can participate in award -winning allegations.
“The judge plays a central role in this process, as he is responsible for ensuring that the procedures are conducted in accordance with the law, ensuring the rights of the parties involved and the legality of collaboration. During the hearings, the judge hears the testimony of the whistleblower, evaluates the relevance of the information provided and decides to grant the benefits provided for by law. “
According to Luísa Walter da Rosa, author of books on criminal agreements and award -winning collaboration and doctoral student in Criminal Procedure at USP, the general idea that judges can participate in award -winning allegations is correct, if it is as inspectors and after the agreement was signed by the parties .
She explains that, after approving the denunciation, the employee may be summoned to provide clarification. The magistrate participates and decides in scenarios in which it is necessary to analyze whether or not the collaboration needs to be terminated, as happened with Mauro Cid.
Award -winning collaboration is an agreement between researcher and investigated, in which the second is committed to helping to investigate negotiated benefits, such as the reduction of penalty.
The answers brought by the IAS, however, brought incorrections or were incomplete, not specifying, for example, that the judge only participates after the approval of the agreement.
“Regarding due process of law, the judge must actually observe the procedure provided for in Law 12.850/2013. The due process involves presumption of innocence, the right to silence, of not producing proof against himself, all guarantees that the employee Voluntarily gives up to establish award -winning collaboration, “says Luísa.
Mariza Ferro, Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the UFF Institute of Computing (Fluminense Federal University), warns that such tools are not suitable for the search for complex themes.
She states that the current promise of this type of technology is to deliver answers that seem coherent and similar to human language, but there is no commitment to the platforms to deliver the correct information.
“Chatgpt is not a search tool. It is possible to receive true results from it, as it is possible that it has nothing really [na resposta] Or half truth, “he says.
Tool responses can also change each time it is called and depending on how the question is asked. In addition, artificial intelligences are not neutral tools and may have biases.
