The one presented by the Attorney General’s Office on Tuesday (18) features two points that have a larger and more robust set of evidence.
Unlike other conclusions listed in the 272 pages of the complaint, the episodes related to the so -called “” and the set of actions and statements of (PL) and allies against the electronic ballot boxes – that there was a minimum indicative of fraud – gather documents, public acts, concrete actions and testimonials that reduce the margin for various interpretations.
Versions of the “draft scam”, the documents prepared to sacrament the institutional rupture and avoid the possession of (PT), were found at the former Minister of Justice, in the room where Bolsonaro uses at, his party, and in Electronic device of, former chief of the aid of Bolsonaro orders and plot whistleblower.
The Federal Police even found a “on the number 2 computer of the General Secretariat of the Presidency, General Mário Fernandes, who detailed the assembly of a crisis office that would manage the country after the barracks.
In addition to the documents, and the testimonies of the then Army Commanders, Freire Gomes, and Aeronautics, Baptista Junior, point out that this draft was presented to the armed forces heads, seeking adhesion in at least two meetings – in December 7 2022, by Bolsonaro himself, and on December 14, by the Defense Minister, the reserve general Paulo Sérgio.
Messages seized on the investigated cell phones and computers reinforce the suspicions in this regard.
Freire Gomes and Baptista Júnior, who would have refused to join the rupture, were also targeted by social networking attacks by Pro-Golpe Bolsonarist centers.
Bolsonaro himself admitted to more recent interviews that were proposed and evaluated states of defense and siege, which in his view would be legitimate instruments that, if taken later, would be sieve of institutions such as Congress and the Councils of the Republic and of the defense.
The instruments and councils, however, are provided for in the legislation to be triggered in very exceptional cases, such as war or serious social seizure, situations that did not present themselves in late 2022.
The attack on the electronic ballot boxes without minimal fraud existence also brings together a series of acts, statements and documents.
Starting with Bolsonaro himself. Since before his victory and continuing after climbing the ramp in 2019, the former president has always been fruitful in questioning the electronic ballot boxes without ever being able to present a plausible indication of suspicion of fraud.
The complaint signed by the Attorney General cites Lives, interviews and meetings in which the then president has in doubt the system and hinted that he would not accept eventual defeat.
In July 2021, for example, but brought only lies and theories that were circulating for years on the internet and had been previously denied.
Gonet highlights in the complaint the ministerial meeting of Bolsonaro of July 2022, three months of the election, in which “unequivocally was spoken in ‘use of force’ as an alternative to be implemented if necessary”. He referred specifically to the intervention of General Augusto Heleno, who said, “Whatever has to be done has to be done before the elections. If you have to punch the table, it is before the elections. If you have to turn the table, It is before the elections. “
Bolsonaro is ineligible for two convictions in the Electoral Court, precisely for a meeting in July 2022 with foreign ambassadors, when he did, claiming to be based on official data.
In addition to these statements and acts, one of the robust points of the PF investigation and the complaint is under pressure on the military to produce a report attesting fraud in the electoral process.
This is one of the main points of Mauro Cid’s denunciation, according to whom Bolsonaro and his surroundings expected the emergence of some manifestation in this sense that would justify the rupture, even after the knowledge that had not been found indicative of fraud.
Army and Air Force commanders attested to a statement that Bolsonaro was aware that the military had not found evidence of fraud.
The report presented after the elections stated that despite the absence of irregularity, the Ministry of Defense could not ensure the full reliability of the process.
Bolsonaro’s PL also hired its own audit and based on allegations never proven. The request was denied.
Other points of Gonet’s complaint give rise to greater controversy.
The attorney general, for example, says that Bolsonaro knew and agreed with the murder plan of authorities ,.
Gonet was also at some points, including the former president’s direct connection with the attack of January 8, 2023. The PF did not indicate him for episode-related crimes. Already Gonet denounced him for the attacks.
The Attorney’s Office, despite putting Mauro Cid’s denunciation as one of the central points of the play, which conflicts with the accusation.
