In Brazil, it says, at one point, that the circumstances mentioned corroborate the repeated conduct of the company “to disrespect the sovereignty of several countries”, but cites as a specific case only one case in Australia involving the X (old).
Sought by Sheet As for the reference to be about X and not on Rumble, the Supreme Court did not respond until the publication of this text.
Moraes determined the suspension of the platform on the grounds that it breaches judicial decisions issued by. The indication of cases from other countries, therefore, does not consist of the main foundation of the order.
In the order against Rumble, after mentioning legislation approved in the European Union (and without citing breaches of measures of any specific platform), Moraes says that in Australia, “as reported, there is also investigation ongoing that the platform does not contribute to the competent authorities for investigation into child abuse practices.”
According to, “Such circumstances prove the contempt for justice and the total lack of cooperation of the Rumble Inc platform with the judicial bodies and corroborate their repeated conduct in disrespecting the sovereignty of several countries, not being a circumstance that occurs exclusively in Brazil.”
However, it refers to a fine against the businessman’s platform X, applied in Australia. With the exception of this example, no cases of non -compliance are cited in other countries.
The same link used now in the decision against Rumble twice had also been used in Moraes’s decision by blocking X last year in the same context. After him, an almost identical passage appeared, but with the name of X and a mention of Musk.
“Such circumstances prove the contempt for justice and the total lack of cooperation of the X platform – and, especially Elon Musk – with the judicial bodies and corroborate their repeated conduct in disrespecting the sovereignty of several countries, not being the circumstance that occurs exclusively in Brazil,” he says.
Popular among the right influencers, Rumble. Created in 2013, the platform is an alternative to YouTube and seeks to differentiate itself by putting itself as in favor of “free speech”, with fewer content moderation rules.
It is now at the center of a clash involving the US government, Brazil, the STF and the pocket opposition.
After orders determining the profile block of influencer Allan dos Santos on the platform, under penalty of fine, Rumble and the media company of the US President ,.
Since then, the company’s CEO, Chris Pavlovski, made different posts challenging Moraes and.
Following, the minister determined the suspension of the platform and ordered her to appoint a legal representative in Brazil.
This week, after one, stating that “blocking access to information and imposing fines on US -based companies for refusing to censor people living in the United States is incompatible with democratic values,” Itamaraty has published a statement.
This Thursday (27), without mentioning the United States ,.
