PGR positioned the deputy as part of the ‘crucial core’ of an alleged criminal organization that would be architecting an attempt to coup d’état
The defense of the deputy, presented to the Federal Supreme Court (), maintains that he dismissed himself from the government of in March 2022, before the Attorney General’s Office (PGR) classifies as a “radicalization” of scammer acts. Ramagem, which is among the 34 reported, denies any participation and states that he was focused on his campaign for federal deputy. Ramage lawyers emphasize that he was no longer part of the government when, according to PGR, Bolsonaro’s speech became more extremist. In a document sent to the Federal Supreme Court (STF), the defense argues that the deputy was not present in the events cited in the complaints, as he was totally dedicated to his candidacy.
“The narrative presented in the complaint clearly demonstrates a radicalization of speeches and acts from 2022, more precisely from July 2022, when Alexandre Ramagem Rodrigues was no longer part of the federal government, having his attention for months focused on the electoral dispute that was ahead,” says the demonstration.
PGR has positioned branch as part of the “crucial core” of a supposed criminal organization, which also includes former President Bolsonaro and other former ministers. The defense disputes this inclusion, stating that the events mentioned by the PGR occurred after the government’s departure from the government, which from 2022 showed “a scenario of absolute recrudation, both public pronouncements and concrete acts that would have been practiced by those involved” and claim that branch “did not take part of any of these facts, since, from March 2022, it fell from the federal government with a purpose Very clear, take care of the planning of your election campaign. ”
In addition, the lawyers point out that the branch seized documents that criticize the electronic ballot boxes only reiterate public statements already made by Bolsonaro. “As censurable may be the interpretation of the content of the archive, it is a mere reiteration of what, according to the complaint itself, the then President of the Republic was already publicly affirming.”
*Report produced with the aid of AI
Posted by Fernando Dias
