It is impressive, although not surprising, the reluctance of parliamentarians to meet the transparency requirement of article 37 to which they belong.
The refusal to live up to the 1988 letter was already evident in 2022 when the then confirmed the illegality of the so -called secret budget and Parliament simply ignored the sentence.
Two years later, he took her seat, decided to end the disrespect and took the bull in the nail. Tried well, calling the legislature and executive representatives for an agreement whereby the use of
It was no use. At the time (PP) left the meeting giving obvious signs that it would be no good. And so it was, with appearance maneuvers that barely disguised the attempt to circumvent not the Supreme Court, but the legality.
Then, with support the collegiate, he tried to badly and suspended the release of resources. As he did in the election period when the amendments could not even be paid, the congressmen did not give much ball, returning to the load with the end of the election.
The most powerful and perverse pressure weapon was used: the Union Budget, locked to this day with a vote linked to the total release of the money.
In a demonstration of goodwill to congress and attention to the executive, Minister Dino accepted a work plan in the form of legislative resolution that has just been approved with what? One more escape trick.
Party countertops and commissions may have amendments without identification of authorship. To beans, therefore, with transparency and obedience to the law.
If deputies and senators resist both the full dissemination of the data of an instrument, as they say, beneficial to the population and, therefore, subject to electoral dividends, it is because something rotten there is to hide. As otherwise the dozens of investigations on ongoing deviations in the Supreme.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
