The president of the United States, Joe Biden, said Monday through his social network, Truth, who has retired and Ashley Biden, the children of his predecessor as president, Joe Biden. The Republican promised one during the electoral campaign. Trump also declared on Monday “nulls” and without validity some of the pardons granted by Joe Biden, but then rectified and admitted that his declaration of social networks had no value to cancel them.
“Hunter Biden has had protection of the secret service for a long period of time, all paid by the US taxpayer. There are up to 18 people in this detachment, which is ridiculous! ”,“ It is reported that, with immediate effect, Hunter Biden will stop receiving protection from the secret service. Also, Ashley Biden, which has 13 agents, will be removed from the list, ”he added.
Trump’s announcement has produced hours after a journalist asked Trump about Hunter Biden’s escort. The president’s son has been one of the favorite whites of the Republicans, who have subjected him to harassment and persecution for years, trying to demonstrate an alleged great corruption scandal that would affect Joe Biden himself. The most promising evidence they achieved was the declaration of.
Hunter Biden was declared guilty of tax crimes and but his father, Joe Biden, the previous president also issued a series of preventive pardons to prevent Trump, the first convict that reaches the presidency of the United States, pursued these rivals politically.
After midnight on Sunday, Trump whose language partly appeared to be an official act. According to the text, “many” of the Biden pardons “are present declared void, vacancies and without effect or validity.” Trump held without any foundation that Biden did not know that he was granting them. The president also claimed that their rubric occurred with a device (Autopen) that is used to sign documents.
Trump, however, rectified later and, to questions from journalists, admitted that with his message he was not annulled the pardons that, on the other hand, did not even specify. Among them seemed to include those granted to the members of the Parliamentary Commission that established their responsibility for the assault on the Capitol, a facts whose criminal consequences escaped by delaying the procedure with the collaboration of the Supreme Court.
In a somewhat delusional message, but that can also be interpreted as another step in drift of Trump towards authoritarianism and the persecution of political rivals, Trump argued that Biden did not know anything about the pardons and that everything was a kind of assembly, so that “the people who did have committed a crime.”
When the White House spokeswoman, Karoline Leavitt, have asked this Monday if there is any evidence or indication that something like this has happened, has limited himself to answering: “You are a journalist, you should find out.” The journalist asked him if Trump’s legal advisors had spoken with him before he published his statement on social networks. “The president [Trump] I was raising the issue, did the president know [Biden] Even these pardons? Was your legal signature used without your consent or knowledge? ”Leavitt replied, throwing their questions into the air and saying that all journalists should ask them, but without contributing the slightest indication in this regard.
All the fantasy Trump construction is based on the possibility that the pardons were not signed in person by Biden, but with a mechanical device known as car, which is used to reproduce a person’s authentic firm. An arm of the machine holds a pen or other writing instrument, which reproduces a firm after a writing sample has been introduced. The presidents, including Trump, have used them for years.
An opinion of the Department of Justice claimed that a car To sign laws. He became the first president to do so in May 2011, when he signed an extension of the patriotic law. Obama was in France on an official trip and, over time by exhausting before the law expired, authorized the use of car to turn it into law.
Much before, in 1929, the Attorney General (the lawyer who defends the United States before the Supreme Court) sent the attorney general a guide on pardons. It is said that “neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribes the method by which executive clemency will be exercised or evidenced,” says Associated Press.
