Guilherme Botacini
BRASILIA, DF (Folhapress)-Donald Trump’s government will revoke the temporary legal status of 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguns and Venezuelans in the United States, according to a warning in the Federal Registry (equivalent to the Federal Official Gazette) on Friday (21).
The latest measure of republican management against immigration will come into force from April 24. In early February, another 300,000 Venezuelans had similar temporary protection also revoked.
The revocation ends the temporary authorization of two years that had been granted to migrants during the management of Democrat Joe Biden. The measure allowed the air to enter the country if they had sponsors in the US.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has taken a number of measures to intensify the repression of illegal migrants and even those who have permission.
On March 6, the Republican stated that he would decide “very soon” would withdraw the status of about 240,000 Ukrainians who fled to the US during the conflict with Russia.
Biden launched a temporary entry and authorization program for Venezuelans in 2022 and expanded him to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguns in 2023, while his management dealt with high levels of irregular immigration of people of these nationalities.
The migratory issue is Trump’s main internal political flag since the election campaign and, in addition to the various decrees and measures to curb new entries and deport migrants after its election, it has also been the object of headache to the White House in court.
Republican management has made deportation flights to Latin American countries. Last weekend, new flights occurred despite the preliminary decision of the Federal Court blocking the flights.
This Friday (21), the federal judge in Washington James Boasberg, responsible for the injunction, rebuked the defense of the government of Donald Trump, saying that some of the documents filed in the case used “disrespectful and foolish” language that he had never seen to be used by government lawyers.
Bomberg did not specify what specific terms had problems. A document filed by the government on Wednesday (19) accused Bomberg of getting involved in a “probative fishing” when seeking information about deportation flights.
The magistrate also stated at this Friday’s audience that he often advises his legal advisers that his most valuable assets are his reputation and credibility. “I would only ask you to guarantee your team to maintain this lesson,” Boa Bomberg told the present government lawyer in another reprimand to defend republican management.
Bomberg said the use of the Trump government’s law of foreign enemies to justify the deportation of people with no removal orders issued by an immigration judge was “incredibly problematic, worrying, and alarming.”
The law is 1798 and authorizes deportations of foreigners during a state of war declared without due process of law -the use of the law for this is the object of the action that resulted in the injunction by blocking the flights.
The government says that the deportes were gang -linked criminals, such as Venezuelan Tren from Arabuo, who would conduct an “irregular war” and “hostile actions” in the US, and therefore management acted within the law.
The Republican and his allies, such as billionaire Elon Musk, have increased the volume of criticism of the judges responsible for blocking orders, to the point of defending the impeachment of these magistrates on the grounds that they interfere with the executive branch improperly.
In a rare criticism of Trump, the country’s Supreme Court President John Roberts said on Tuesday that asking for a judge to disagree with his decisions is not an “appropriate response.”
The repeated disrespect of court orders by the president and the executive’s authorities could lead to the serious institutional crisis in the view of experts. Trump, despite criticism of the judges, says he will not fail to abide by court orders.
Bomberg sought details of the flights, held despite ordering them not to occur, in hearings with republican management lawyers.
In addition to increasingly incisive criticism, initially executive authorities said the order of blocking was given after the start of flights, and that it would not be possible to return with the planes. At an audience during the week, lawyers refused to provide information for “national security” reasons without detailing what this would mean in this particular case.
Precise information about the flights, such as the deported, schedules, origins and exact destinations, would provide details about the blocked measure to support the judge’s decision. On Thursday (20), Boaberg stated that the government’s responses on flights were “unfortunately insufficient.”
At the same time, Bomberg evaluates whether the government was actually disobeyed its blockade order -he gave five days, until next Tuesday (25), for republican management to explain why the failure to paralyze migrant removals would not have violated the court order.
