He could even have done “one or another” differently, but he doesn’t feel “embarrassed” for being “accused of working”. Luís Montenegro does not hide that I knew I was going to go through “This scrutiny” because ofo “Such” made “in good faith” would have “transmitted the company soon to the children and the subject would not exist. “
“Shocked by the insinuations launched because they have no foundation.” This is how Luís Montenegro says he feels when he speaks of all, The family company that led to the fall of the government. ANDM interview with the Goucha program at TVI, The outgoing prime minister reiterates that it is all “a cloak of insinuations and political use, which has no correspondence with the facts.”
The still Head of government admits, however, that “one or another” could have been done differently, but that “deep down, “he was All made of good faith “ And that what you did “any Portuguese would do” in your place.
“It is true that we could have transmitted soon [a empresa] For my children and the subject would not exist, and today, looking at all this, it would have been the best option, “he revealed in the interview, insisting, as he had done at the beginning of the controversy, who never thought that this situation”could be misunderstood. “
As for the delay in explanations, Montenegro assumes that “there may have been some error from my communication point of view, but it is still” available “to answer questions, reinforcing that Never committed “an act of corruption”.
However, it points out that “It can’t be worth everything“because” they can be done Questions to draw clarifications, but conclusions cannot be drawn on the basis of wicked reasoning. “
“No one has never been scrutinated at the level I was. I even think it is perverse that some of my political opponents demand me transparency, when they are a long way from the transparency I have had,” he took the opportunity to launch the criticism.
One more controversy … ” Questions blown to the auricular of journalists “
Despite having talked about these statements later, this Tuesday, he stressed that his words were in “defense of the Social Communication Service and even in its relationship with new communication phenomena, such as social networks. “
Still on this subject, Montenegro says that It does not want to “invade the journalist’s decision of decision.”
