The PP is willing to use “all instruments” at its disposal and to go to “all instances”, political and even judicial to try to revoke a presidency knocked down the debate of four amendments of the PP vetoed before by most of the table with a controversial decision that still collected. The popular want to make a total and democratic cause of that precedent, which labels as an arbitrary “prevarication” of the presidency. The popular spokesman in the lower house, Miguel Tellado, came to catalog the president of the Congress on Tuesday, and the first vice president, Alfonso Rodríguez Gómez de Celis, of being “referees bought at the service of the Government” of Pedro Sánchez.
In this frontal attack strategy to the Presidency of the Courts, the PP presented several requests for reconsideration of that action and claimed a written report of the major lawyer and general secretary of the Chamber, a report attributing in favor of its thesis in a misrepresented way. Actually, the text, which will be discussed this Friday at a new meeting of the table, is much more nuanced and distributes reasons against the Government for rejecting amendments approved by the Senate for the first time but also against the PP and the Upper House, where the popular ones have an absolute majority, because it maintains that these amendments should never have reached the congress.
The least thing in this pharragosa dispute is the four. The PP wanted to cause the ways in which they remembered their debate in the agenda of the plenary last week and even more in the ways in which the then president of the Congress in functions, Alfonso Rodríguez Gómez de Celis, dispatched the situation by not allowing a postponement of the discussion of that matter, which also supported Juns and ERC for other reasons. The PP expressed that rejection and then, in the middle of the plenary, pounding from its seats against the attitude of the vice president. A week later, it maintains that tension by advancing all kinds of possible judicial and political resources at the table itself, writings of reconsideration of the decision and demands of a nonverbal report of the major lawyer, Fernando Galindo, that the popular have been arguing days arguing that he legally endorsed only his positions; A half truth.
The senior and general secretary of the Chamber, until now very questioned by the PP since its appointment, gave the reason for the members of the PP table in part and thus will include their position in the minutes of that meeting that will be seen and will have to ratify at the meeting of that body on Thursday. The lawyer will also endorse in that writing event what on Tuesday of last week expressed orally when he stressed, that the Senate where the PP promoted and approved with its absolute major Budget income will require government compliance for processing. ” The Congress table grabbed that assumption.
The Secretary General of Congress also expressed then, and will finish it this Friday in its official report, that the Government should not have vetoed those amendments once that filter passed and they arrived from the Senate because it understands that the doctrine in respect of the Constitutional Court is clear in the sense that it is the table of each Chamber that has to verify whether the requirements are given or not so that the government can exercise those budgetary vetoes in that phase. Something that had never happened so far in more than 40 years of validity of the Chamber Regulations.
All this debate, between technician, political and regulatory, served this Mars to climb another step in his attacks from the first day of this legislature against the presidency of the Congress and very particularly against Armengol, which he blames to be “El Felpudo” of Sánchez and have allowed with the performance of his vice president last week to commit a crime of “live and live prevarication” in his intention to “trample the rights of 350 deputies.” Tellado ended up stating that Armengol and Gómez de Celis are “arbitrators bought at the service of the government of Sánchez.”
