The leakage of the signal
By far, the greatest history of the day is the impressive revelation of The Atlantic That Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, discussed sensitive bombing plans in Yemen with other high Trump government officials in a messaging application-in a group text that mistakenly included the public editor of the publication, Jeffrey Goldberg.
The incident raised serious questions about whether the group chat violated laws, including the espionage law, and endangered troops. But it is also a reminiscent of how Wall Street companies have entered the trouble for similar reasons. They had to pay more than $ 2 billion because they made the type of message “outside the channel” [tradução livre da expressão “off-channel”] that Hegseth and others are being harshly criticized.
“We are currently clean at OPSEC,” Hegseth wrote at one point, referring to operational safety, during a group chat at Signal, according to Goldberg. The Secretary of Defense then revealed detailed war plans on the same channel. Goldberg, who had been added by Michael Waltz, the National Security Counselor, said he did not include the more confidential details of the chat in his article.
Although Goldberg writes that initially wasn’t sure if the whole thing was a joke or a misinformation campaign, the launch of air attacks against targets in Yemen eventually convinced him that it was real. (Waltz replied with emojis to the details of the bombing: “👊🇺🇸🔥”.)
Goldberg later left the group and confirmed with the White House that the chat was real.
Critics say the group chat has violated safety laws and protocols. It did not occur in government -approved safe systems and may have occurred on government officials, which would be target of hackers by foreign opponents.
Continues after advertising
In addition, Waltz had set some of the group’s messages to disappear after one week and others after four weeks. For involving discussions about official acts, if they were not promptly referred to the government’s official accounts for filing, participants could have conflicted with federal laws.
Examples in Wall Street
Such charges are similar to that financial companies faced regulators, which have imposed great fines for the use of “off -channel” messaging services, including Signal, WhatsApp and Imessage. More than two dozen institutions – including the Robinhood negotiation application, creditors Wells Fargo and BNP Paribas and others – admitted violating the provisions of maintenance of securities. (Individual bankers were also fined by their employers.)
The reasons are similar: SEC and others have pressured banks to keep control over their employees’ messages to ensure that no law is violated. “Failure to maintain records such as these impair our ability to exercise effective regulatory supervision, often at the expense of investors,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, then SEC deputy director in 2023, announcing $ 289 million in fines against 11 companies.
Continues after advertising
Will the Trump era regulators polish this going forward? Two of the current SEC commissioners, Mark Uyeda (who is now interim president) and Hester Peirce, have criticized these cases because “it doesn’t seem to have a viable path to compliance.”
Paul Atkins, President Trump’s choice to lead the commission, thinks: “I’m not sure if this is the most productive paradigm or the best for an agency to follow,” he said in a federalist society panel last April.
c. 2025 The New York Times Company
