Minister of the (Supreme Court) for 31 years, says that I would not like to be tried by the Court if you commit any “misconduct” – which expects not to commit – and argues that the minister review the penalty of.
The former minister, who publicly criticizes (PL) by the court, questions the Supreme’s competence to judge the former president. “The Constitution reveals the competence of the Supreme. And competence is strict right, it is something that is in the Constitution and nothing more. But they are saying competent to judge everyone,” he says.
“Where was the current president judged at the time? President Lula? Na. He was a former president, why wasn’t he tried in the Supreme?” He asks.
He also disputes the judgment of those involved in and says that the situation is bad “from the moment the maximum organ of the judiciary declares itself competent to judge ordinary citizens.”
“I, for example, would not like to be judged there in the Supreme if I would commit a misuse of conduct that I hope I do not commit,” he says, also criticizing the fact that the trial is being carried out in the first class, rather than in the court plenary.
The former minister signals alignment with Fux in the issue of Débora’s penalty, sentenced to 14 years for graffiti. Fux asked for more time to analyze the case and, this Wednesday (26), indicated that he will revise the penalty of the hairdresser.
“That girl, for example, who used a gun that was a lipstick and paid tribute to the minister [Luís Roberto] who repeated what he said there in New York. She has been touched by 14 years, “says Marco Aurélio, who advocates the review signaled by Fux.” I hope he does it. Because they had been there … The rapporteur, the minister, had a penalty that is exorbitant and considers several crimes, including armed criminal association. Her gun was the lipstick. “
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
