O is the best social program of Lula’s third term. He seeks to encourage needy young people to stay in high school classrooms, offering them scholarships of $ 1,000 at the end of each school year completed. Reporter André Shalders showed that the program is contaminated by fraudsters. In a stattered ruling, there are cities where the number of scholarships is. Riacho de Santana, Bahia, had 1,231 scholarships. The direction of the only public college in the city reports that there are only 1,024 enrolled in high school. Already the State Secretariat says that the students are 1,677. For the, they would be 1,860. Whatever the right number, there is cat in the tuba.
In recent times, the MEC has had two ambitious programs: OEO. The first enrolled in private students well placed in Enem. Success, did not cost a penny, as the scholarships were offset tax exemptions granted time ago. The Fies, in theory, financed students from private faculties. Failure, he lent non -guarantor to young people with mediocre performances at Enem. In real life, the widow was passed on the delinquency portfolios of the Magans of Private Higher Education. The FIES resulted in an estimated rhdress of $ 20 billion.
If the FIES drain had been recognized or denounced in the first year of the party, the hole would have been smaller. Unfortunately, the government preferred to play the contenting game, while the actions of the groups that controlled the colleges pumped on the stock exchange.
The fraud discovered in the footing foot are punctual, as the money goes straight to the pocket of students or their families. The MEC has two ways: it can sweep the problem under the carpet with magic statistics or can ride on the complaints, exposing the fraudulent municipalities. It’s hard to imagine that fraud in a city leads from a student initiative. The bid would be impossible without the invisible hand of people from the municipal public network.
In addition to the frauds that can demoralize the foot, under the MEC umbrella today there is another weirdness today. The National Institute for Educational Studies and Research, of the performance of the states. The decision, made by the direction ,.
The shelved data show that some states are going well and others go wrong. The political effect of these evaluations is obvious: some governors will be happy, and others, bitter.
SAEB (Basic Education Evaluation System) is an achievement of national pedagogy. He shows who goes well and who won’t. Its usefulness depends on the dissemination of research.
To evaluate to shelve would be to repeat what Dom Pedro 2nd did. In his trips around Brazil, in addition to counting stairs, he made a point of visiting schools, arguing teachers and students. In 1859 he went to Bahia, told 107 steps, talked to several teachers, noted everything, for nothing. As Sérgio Buarque de Holanda recalled, in that evaluation and paternal figure there was “a lot of ballast for little candle.”
Inep data and the footsteps cannot become a boat ballast without candle.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
