Deputies and senators gave in to the (Supreme Court) and plan the dissemination, individually, who is the godfather of each appeal sent to states and municipalities through the committee amendments to the budget – criticized by the lack of transparency on who is the real author of the nominations.
The committees of the sessions already held last week with this goal and the ones were summoned to vote the minutes with the nominations between Thursday (3) and Friday (4). The goal is to officialize the supporter/godfather of each money, as promised to the Supreme Court so that payments can occur.
It is a new attempt to contemplate demands from the Supreme Court (STF), which has questioned the lack of publicity of the authors of the requests for money.
At first, after the unlocking of the amendments by the Minister of the Supreme Court, the reaction of the congress was the money. A resolution project was approved on March 13 to allow the party leader to sign the appeal on behalf of all members of his bench.
The initiative was criticized by parliamentarians of the new and the, but was approved. Party leaders said, however, that the understanding should prevail that, if this model adopted, the Supreme Court could return to the payment of the amendments, as already occurred with a letter sent by the senators in December and overthrown by Dino.
In addition, part of the congressmen said he did not want to be responsible for the decisions of colleagues, in the face of and investigations by.
In the Senate, the commissions gathered last week and approved the ratification of the 2024 nominations, with the update of the name of each senator who sponsored the money. In the Foreign Relations Commission, for example, ten senators assumed R $ 5 million in nominations each for shares in the.
In the House, the installation of the permanent committees occurred later and the minutes with the choices have not yet been approved. Committee meetings were summoned to this Thursday and Friday, in a virtual way-or that will be, the deputies will vote for mobile, even far from Brasilia, which PSOL accused being a device to make it difficult for contestations.
Parliamentarians have said that some benches could still use the leader’s figure as the author of the amendment as a way to avoid internal disputes between those who receive the most and who receives less, but that most parties would send resources individually to receive the approval of the commissions.
“It will be referred by the leader for the commissions, but the name of each parliamentarian is named,” said the leader of the deputy (RJ).
“In my party, we will individualize the author of each amendment,” said the leader of, Áureo Ribeiro (RJ).
On Wednesday night, the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) fired a message to deputies and leaders with the list of amendments and procedures for supporters to assume the authorship of resources. The message was alert that schedules cannot be changed because resources are already committed.
In addition to the CCJ, there were also ten other commissions of the Chamber, such as health and national integration.
