In an unanimous decision, the (National Council of Justice) sentenced the Boconist Judge Ludmila Lins Grilo of the Minas Gerais Court of Justice to a second compulsory retirement.
Minister Roberto Barroso chaired the virtual judgment on the 21st.
Ludmila ostensibly supported the presidential candidacy in 2018. He participated in political party acts and criticized the higher courts.
In the pandemic, the population has not been wearing anti-covid masks.
His was ruled by the Minas Gerais Court in May 2023. Ludmila was accused of offending judges who sanctioned a warning. He wrote that they would only accept manifestations of “Lambe-Botas and Baba Eggs”, “Adolation and Poxhism.”
The CNJ and the TJ-MG still maintain lawsuits under the secret of justice involving the magistrate.
The second punishment was published in the Electronic Justice Gazette on the 25th. The consequences of the new trial may reinforce any measures of the MPF (Federal Prosecutor) in the penal sphere.
The ex-judgment receives the proceeds proportional to the contribution time.
The cases of accumulated retirement are rare. A TRF-4 Judge (Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region) has already received a third compulsory retirement penalty.
On social networks, Ludmila declares himself “exiled in the United States.” She left the country without communicating the trip to court. It was declared revel. Did not report the address to send quote.
According to the TJ-MG, contact with Ludmila is restricted to the request for proof of life, a standard procedure for retirees. The report could not hear the judge.
As Sheet He revealed, the licensed deputy, to investigate any attempted coercion against the freedom of expression of 14 individuals on American soil. Among them, Paulo Figueiredo, Rodrigo Constantino, Allan dos Santos and Ludmila.
The lawsuit related to the magistrate rose to the CNJ in August 2022. The Minas Gerais Court had filed him, claiming that the source was anonymous. The then corregedor Luís Felipe Salomão disagreed, as the CNJ admits the anonymous complaint as the beginning of the race. The print sent by the complainant corresponded to the publication in the judge’s personal profile.
Solomon noted that Ludmila “did not fulfill her basic duties.” A Criminal and Childhood and Youth Court of the District of Unaí, of which he was holder, identified 1,291 paralyzed cases, several of them from arrested defendants.
The Federal Public Defender’s Office initially refused to designate a defender. A dative lawyer requested the filing of the administrative proceeding. He said that the demonstrations did not compromise the impartiality of the judge, who had made the comments as a teacher.
Ludmila did not attend the virtual audience for interrogation.
The rapporteur, Caputo Bastos, welcomed MPF suggestion and voted for the second compulsory retirement, accompanied by the board.
Otherwise
When the Minas Gerais General Corregedor, he saw evidence of crime and proposed disciplinary proceedings against Ludmila Grilo, in January 2021, the magistrate challenged:
“While not decreed state of defense or state of siege (…) I will continue to support the legal unfeasibility of Lockdown and the restrictions of freedoms via decrees.”
In a CNJ session, Ludmila made her own defense. He said the State Court’s Institutional Security Office (GSI) warned of threats against his life. He said he dismissed the police escort, insufficient to ensure his protection, and stopped working in person.
The political connection portal reproduced the judge’s statement: “I was silent all kinds of defamation regarding my professional conduct.”
Ludmila wrote that he would lead to the Inter -American Court of Human Rights the “actions involving persecutors” practiced by the CNJ and (Supreme Court).
In 2020, Corregedor Humberto Martins filed a request for measures. He understood that there was no cause for complaint or disciplinary proceedings.
