After seeing his popularity collapsing earlier this year, the president (PT) stacked the crisis and has achieved a slight improvement in the proportion of those who evaluate his management as great or good, according to the latest research.
The approval rate rose from 24%in the February survey to 29%. But it follows from the 38% that consider the government as bad or bad – being 41%. Those who classified their management as regular are still 32%.
Datafolha heard 3,054 people, 16 years old or older, in 172 municipalities, from Tuesday (1st) to Thursday (3). The search margin of the search is 2 percentage points, more or less.
The figures assessed this week are on the second worst level of Lula 3 management – the situation is only better than February.
In other Datafolha surveys throughout the petista’s third term, the index of those who saw the government as great or good was at least numerically higher than bad or bad. In December, the approval rate was 35%, compared to 34% of the failure.
Lula’s drop in popularity was, which has pressured inflation, and – with measures that motivated fake news about an alleged taxation.
The petista made at the beginning of the year a change in Secom (Secretariat of Social Communication), putting the. As showed the Sheetmembers of the executive and parliamentarians made the assessment that the measures already taken.
According to the Datafolha survey, Lula’s current positive evaluation rate is similar to 28% recorded in October and December 2005, during its first term and amid the crisis of.
In the same period of his term of office in May 2021, amid Covid’s pandemic, (). At that time, 30% evaluated the government as regular.
When asked whether to approve or disapprove of the Lula administration, the current scenario is a tie within the margin of error: 49% disapprove, while 48% approve. Another 3% say they don’t know.
Despite the lightweight approval since February, future expectation about the government has not improved.
When asked if, from now on, Lula will make a great, good, regular, bad or terrible government, the index of those who make a positive prognosis is the same as the negative: 35%. Another 28% say it will be regular.
Compared to the results previously measured, this is the first time that the most optimistic perspective has not been numerically higher than negative.
In addition, the scenario moves away from the measured at the beginning of the third term in March 2023, when 50% said Lula would make a great/good government, against only 21% who had a pessimistic view.
Also the answer to the question if life has improved or worsened after Lula’s inauguration does not bring good news to the government: 29% say it worsened. In July last year, 23% said the same.
Already those who say that life has improved was 28%, varying within the margin of error (before it was 26%). Those who respond that life remained the same went to 42% (leaving the previous level of 51%).
Considering only women (with a three-point margin of error), Lula’s great or good assessment is now 30%, improving the February index, where it had bound 24% in the segment that gave it 38% until December.
Among the poorest – those who earn up to two minimum wages, with a margin of error of three points – the government saw its positive assessment oscillate only one percentage point, being 30% (it was 29% in February). The segment was the one in which Lula did better, with 44% positive evaluation in December.
The partial recovery of the president’s positive assessment from April was stronger, as Datafolha points out, among those with higher education (margin of four points), which went from 18% to 31%, and also among the highest income ranges.
Among those who earn 2 to 5 salaries (margin of three points), the positive evaluation rate went from 17% to 26%. Both among those who earn 5 to 10 salaries (margin of five points) and in the range of those who earn more than 10 salaries (eight -point margin) from 18% to 31%.
Among the regions of the country, the positive assessment of the president follows higher in the Northeast (margin of four points), with 38%. But it has not yet recovered from the fall from December to February, when it fell from 49% to 33%.
In the Southeast, the positive evaluation is 25%, compared to 20% in the last survey.
It and provides contracts of ministries, banks and state -owned companies that can reach R $ 3.5 billion this year, after the completion of bids for the selection of advertising agencies.
Last Thursday, under the command of Sidônio, the petista management made one, entitled “Brazil giving around”.
