Where is nothing? Can we find it? What can you do to us? It’s not philosophy – it’s physical, and a scientist can have the answer. It seems that nothing is inevitable.
Physicist Antonio Padilla explains in the existence of two concepts: nothingness and nothingness. Yes, the only apparent difference is in NA NECK or Tiny, but that changes everything.
Nothing means something that does not exist, and it can never be anything. It’s a real nothing: it was never anything, it will never be anything, a little as Fernando Pessoa wrote.
But when we talk about the lowercase N the case changes figure. And it all started with Leucipl and Democritus, Still in the 5th century AC: They proposed that matter is composed of atoms that exist in the middle of an infinite void – nothing.
On the other hand, in eastern philosophy, nothing is something else: it is a kind of liberation – emptiness is enlightenment. In 1299, however, the authorities in Florence went so far as to prohibit the use of Hindu-Arhabic numbers, especially zero. It was the dispute between West and the East, with two very different philosophy.
During the Middle Ages, however, it was believed that God could do everything, and therefore could create the emptiness.
Nowadays, many scientists believe it is the energy of emptiness. But what is, after all, nothing. Where is it?
In 1982, physicist Fields Ed Witten discovered spacetime instability. Nothingness, he says, can arise literally from nothing and start Devour the universe inside. Even anyway: a bubble of nothing appeared in his house, he carried everything, including the space. It may seem fanciful, but the idea aroused scientific curiosity.
Two investigators at Princeton University, Adam Brown and Alex Dahlen, formulated in 2011 that nothing is a infinitely negative curve.
When energy is positive, the curve is infinitely positive and when it is energy is negative, the opposite happens, but what is observed is a universe that initially expands before collapsing over itself, disappearing in one apocalyptic crisis.
Deep down, the two scientists attested to Witten’s theory: they imagined bubbles full of negative energy. As they increased curvature inside the bubble for increasing negative values, physics approached increasingly than Witten had seen.
Can nothing that destroy then be anyway? The theory is even sustained by “holographic principle“That postulates that the universe.
And nothing is not only possible: it is also inevitable So a Harvard team tasted.
The simplest quantum gravity theory of all describes nothingness. According to physicists Jake McNamara and Cumrun takes a look, it is possible to move from one theory of quantum gravity to another. Therefore, it is possible to “get in” and “get out” from nowhere.
Nothing exists, but can it destroy the universe? Some physicists believe yes, but there is nothing to prove nothing. Where it is, we do not know, but it is somewhere-it is not easy to find it.
