In analysis, the debate between the President of the arrival, André Ventura, and the PAN spokesman, Inês Sousa Real. ThatHas it had better performance? The notes of the commentators of SIC.
Nuno Ramos de Almeida
“It was a parallel debate in which they did not play, in place. There was obviously controversial, but it was a debate that started with the various causes of the arrival – the Chemical castration to violation and then to immigration. Inês Sousa Real somehow managed to have a better installment. ”
José Gomes Ferreira
“This debate was poor, not to mention it was mediocre. I only give a positive note of 5 because it is the first. of doubt. The themes were absolutely marginal. It is not that they are not decent topics, but who proposes to govern the country, more or less likely, You have to have political projects with a global design (…) and priorities in the head.”
Diogo ugly
“If it were from 0 to 20, they would go to Oral. It was a weak debate. Each of them was waiting for their moment for social networks. (…) These two candidates, a year later, conot equal. They changed nothing. This debate could have been a year ago and it was the same. It was especially negative for André Ventura, who says he is a candidate for prime minister. It showed today that it is not. I think this was very clear. ”
Miguel Prata Roque
“André Ventura missed the game. QUndo was asked, from the point of view of governability, what would do in a scenario where the right has a majority in Parliament and the PSD cannot form government Together with CDs and IL, I could not explain. On the other hand, the main questions of the country were not discussed. ”
