Alberto González, Ayuso’s boyfriend, in his labyrinth

I thought of a labyrinth of labyrinths, in a sinuous growing maze that would cover the past and the future and that somehow implied the stars.

Jorge Luis Borges, fictions

We are what Babia’s domains should be. We talk not about the town of the region of the province of León, but about the management of the company BABIA CAPITAL SLwhich appears domiciled in León and also in Madrid. And here in the Madrid street of Bravo Murillo number 50 at the crossroads with the street of Ríos Rosas, the lady who attends the goal, after expressing her ignorance of the person of Javier Gómez Hidalgothe economist and fiscalist who is Single Administratorand of existence, in this building, of society BABIA CAPITAL SLsuggests that perhaps next to it, which also carries the number 50 we will find the answer. But not. There is a gym that this spring afternoon on Friday, April 11, remains closed.

What has been lost in Babia?

While Alberto González Amadorcouple of Isabel Díaz Ayusohe declared as charged with Corruption crimesthe president of the Community of Madrid urged entrepreneurs in Quito, Ecuador, to deregulate. “We have heard companies, professionals and citizens to Reduce legislation and eliminate obsolete requirements that hinder the creation of business. ”And, precisely, González Amador, on his own initiative, took out the issue of the attic he enjoys, since 2023 with his partner in EThe Madrid neighborhood of Chamberi186 meters, just above its floor acquired in 2022, of 167 meters (362 square meters in total).

As explained to the Immaculate Judge Iglesias, he did not have the money to buy the attic, whose value amounted to 950.000 eurosand his friend and legal representative of his business, the economist Javier Gómez FidalgOr, he did the favor of acquiring it and offering him a rental contract of 5.000 euros a month with purchase option.

Gómez Hidalgo bought it through Babia Capital, in cash, No bank loan No mortgage any.

Babia was established in 2019 with a share capital of 6.000 euros and its net amount of the business figure in recent years is around 271,000 euros at the close of 2021 and from 91,000 to December 2022.

How could Babia, Society without heritage and without contracting debt Buy Tocateja – apparently to an owner who resisted selling – the attic of the Madrid street of Dominico Data Scarlets?

The mystery, which González Amador emerged, without providing accrediting documents about his purchase option, has a financial name: derivatives.

A financial derivative is a financial product whose value depends on the evolution of the price of another asset, which is called underlying active. These underlying assets can be a stock market index, Actions, fixed income values, currencies, raw materials, interest rates and others. A financial derivative is a Term contract in which all the details of the hiring are set when the agreement is closed, except for effective exchange, which is delayed at a future moment.

And so we are arriving in González Amador and the favor of his friend Javier (Gómez Fidalgo).

In 2023 Babia accounts there is a derivative. ¡Eureka!

And a purchase option can be, in effect, a Purchase option. You pay a premium to have an option to buy with the right at a price of the good within a certain period.

But friend what is that cousin in the derivative that appears in the liability of Babia society. Well, 955.000 euros.

But that is not a cousin, that is the total price of the property. So what is the favor of friend Javier to González Amador?

Because we are clear. The property entered Babia’s books in 2023 and that derivative is 2023 and the two are by equivalent amount. The property is in the asset for 950,000 euros and the derivative (purchase option) in the liability for 955,000.

And that derivative it’s not A financial liability in the sense of a debt, a loan. Put derived. It has to be the Purchase option For the price they have put, the entire price that the one who has paid it would pay, if you exercise it, you do not have to pay anything.

Is it that who has that option paid the property and is instrumentalized as a purchase option?

And let’s be even clearer.

What attracts attention is that the liability that Finish that purchase of the attic is a derivative and that cannot be anything other than the purchase option that González Amador has said, in court, possessing, and courtesy of his friend Javier.

Because, as has been pointed out, the value of the option in the book of the Babia is equal to the amount of the property, then it is yours, the day you want to execute that option does not have to pay anything, it is already paid. By González AmadoR? By Another person?

We have two options for the structure of this operation

The first is that González Amador’s friends have said: “We are going to give you a floor, how? We buy the floor on your own and we recognize you so you can stay with it. The liability 955,000 euros It corresponds to a derivative of 955,000 euros. You exercise the option and stay with the property. ”

The second option is that González Amador was who contributed the money and the entire operation would cover up the fiction of a sale. Problem: It would be necessary to investigate where the Black money. And, of course, we would be talking about alleged money laundering.

Commerce fund, where are you?

González Amador has justified why he paid 500,000 euros in the purchase of the society without heritage, of zero accounting value according to the Treasury, called Beauty Circleowned by Gloria Carrasco Fernández, wife of the president and general director of Quirón Prevention -Del sanitary group that hires with the Community of Madrid- with whom the Diaz Ayuso couple has been doing business for several years.

As he said, also without accrediting documents, because he had, in 2020, a Trade Fund or an intangible that represented its commercial network.

Problem: In the accounts (see picture) of Maxwell Cremona, the buyer, of 2021, does not appear that trade fund or observation that value that “intangible”.

A society without heritage, such as Maxwell Cremona, whose unique administrator is González AmadorCan you afford to buy an “intangible” of that type?

The trade fund is the ability to generate future benefits thanks to intangible assets that can generate future benefits, such as the value of the brand, the client portfolio, its positioning, the ‘know-how’ or the value of patents.

Good. Is that beauty circle has no income, it does not generate cash-flow (cash flows and treasury) In other words, the company’s asset has no income. Is it paid for something that has no income? A lost pharmacy in a town in León has a red comercial for which it is paid and does not generate income, it does not generate charges, the right to collection of any. And that the most important asset of the company than the bought, Maxwell Cremonait has to be explained in the accounts. And it is not in those of 2021, which is when the seat has to be counted.

It lacks an economic common sense to pay 500,000 euros for an asset that does not generate income but a fantasy called Commerce fundo.

How to recover the 500,000 euros if it does not generate income? You can pay for El Corte Inglés above the market value of real estate because there are A brand image relatively quantifiable, but that is always residual in total payment. It cannot be that the fundamental element is that. Never Most of what you are paying will be a trade fund. In the case of beauty circle it is not identifiable and lacks rights over that commercial network. That cost price is an economic fiction. You can represent a 5 o 10% total paidbut it turns out that the total payment is that you have paid without any expectation of Cash-Flow generation.

It is already known that González Amador is charged or investigated that is the same. And, of course, I was not obliged To tell the truth or declare against yourself. The research of the separate piece González Amador -irón is in diapers. And to go to the main piece and make a agreement of conformity on the two fiscal crimesDíaz Ayuso’s couple need to be filed separate piece. Because accepting, as I thought, eight months in jail for the 350,961 defrauded (exercise 2020/2021) allows do not enter prisonbut then he is convicted by corruption in business (sentences of 6 months to 5 years in prison) Pact of conformity.

Subscribe to continue reading