O, usually aligned with the Lula administration, says it will open a rare divergence with federal management if there is a defense of reduction of penalties to
“The group will not accept any kind of parliament and government agreement with those who advocate reduction of feathers or amnesty. There is no room for it. We cannot allow them to vulgarize the episodes of January 8 and try to turn violent acts against institutions into a kind of tour in the park,” says the coordinator, lawyer Marco Aurélio de Carvalho.
The discussion gained body after the Minister of Institutional Relations, Gleisi Hoffmann, said that the discussion about penalties could be made by. With the poor repercussion in the Lulist base, she later explained herself, saying that the issue has to be debated within the STF.
For Carvalho, any judicial revisions should be individual cases, which need to be dealt with by the judiciary. “If there is any kind of exaggeration in any kind of penalty for an individual, that this is discussed in his own realm, which is the justice system, in the STF,” he said.
For the lawyer, “any attempt at agreement is a shame.”
“Civil society has to react. We hope that the government does not act from the prospect of softening the situation,” he said. “If the government is working on it, we have a difference that is unsurpassed,” added the group coordinator.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
