In recent weeks, the party of, put pressure that amnesty those involved on January 8, with the purpose that the text can be more fresh.
Support is not being collected, however, from the endorsement to an already articulated and mature text.
Deputies consulted by Sheet who have already supported the urgency or who are at the head of the joints – part of them under reserve – make statements in the line that the text will be debated later. There is also no unique speech about which version of the text would be the basis of discussions.
Some say that the tendency is for the text to follow the line of, or to depart from the text originally presented in 2022. In addition, there are disagreements about the scope of amnesty that should be approved.
Versions presented so far could, in theory, also benefit the former president.
On the night of last Thursday (10), the leader of the PL in the house, the deputy Sostenes Cavalcante (RJ),. The decision to guide or not the urgency, however, depends on the president of the house, (-PB).
After a week of obstruction and act on Paulista Avenue, in São Paulo, with speeches aiming at the president of the house, the PL.
Motta, in turn, to reduce the pressure for the approval of the proposal – to an affront to the (Federal Supreme Court) and possible trigger of an institutional crisis.
Already Bolsonaro, after conversation with Motta on Wednesday (9), to reduce resistance to the project in the house, facing the assessment that deputies think they were hard, but that it is necessary to punish those who have depredated the headquarters of the three powers.
The substitute presented at the CCJ in 2024, which is currently not valid, already excluded from amnesty crimes such as bodily injury and damage to artistic or historical value. He had been presented by (União Brasil-SE), deputy aligned with Bolsonaro, before (-al) and withdraw the case of the CCJ.
He predicted amnesty to those who participated in demonstrations on January 8 and also “to everyone who attended subsequent events or previous events” as long as they maintain correlation with the events mentioned.
Among deputies who heard by the report, there are those who classify the debate about what would be the scope and boundaries of amnesty as still very vague. According to the office of another parliamentarian, the urgency should be understood as relative to the theme of amnesty, not the writing of the project. Another says that if the proposal goes to the plenary, it intends to present an amendment to prevent the amnesty from applying to Bolsonaro.
It would be up to Motta to indicate the rapporteur of the proposal in the plenary, who would present a new substitute text from the negotiations in the house. Since Valadares is quoted, but it is not the only name.
Questioned by Sheet On what extent there would be a hit on the project text in the conversations for subscription collection, Cavalcante Sostenes said he had not yet arrived in this discussion.
“No, I haven’t even arrived at this yet, we are facing such a big battle that it is first to be urgent. Text is discussed the later,” he said a day before reaching the goal.
He disagrees, however, that there is undefined: “I don’t think it has indefinition. Amnesty by itself, the word speaks.” And it adds that, like any and all text, when passing through the plenary, it can have “adjustments to expand amnesty or to minor”.
Asked if the project would include Bolsonaro, he replied, “Of course not. He’s not final, he has no condemnation. How are we going to amnesty someone who is not condemned yet?”
Deputy Captain Augusto (PL-SP) also stated that the first step now is to approve the urgent request, then then work to obtain consensus around a proposal. Personally, he is favorable that the proposal includes amnesty to former President Bolsonaro.
Valadares also states that the text will still be discussed. According to him, the most consensual points would be in the line of amnestying people from the penalties of coup and abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, but not from the punishment by depredation.
Asked if the amnesty would also include those who have not yet been convicted, he responded to an absurd analyzes that had come to him that it would be unconstitutional to amnesty unnamed people.
The urgent request was made in a bill presented by then-deputy Major Vitor Hugo (PL-GO), still in 2022, with an original focus on amnesty participants in highways and in front of Quarteis.
He provides “amnesty to all who have participated in demonstrations anywhere in the national territory of October 30, 2022 to the day of entry into force” of the law. .
The lawyer and professor of Criminal Law at UFMG (Federal University of Minas Gerais) Frederico Horta points out that if he was adopted as the CCJ substitute, Bolsonaro would be included. “The amnesty law will establish a universe of people according to the type of imputation and according to a time delimitation,” he says, noting that the proposal also encompassed acts prior to January 8.
Horta also states that the amnesty would not be restricted to people who have already been condemned – differently – even encompassing people who have not yet been processed or denounced. He says he considers, however, that, in the present case, the proposal would possibly be.
