Deputy Alfredo Gaspar (União Brasil-AL) was chosen to be the rapporteur of the request to suspend the criminal action against the Federal Deputy (-RJ) in the case of.
The decision generated contradiction among governors, who see in the processing of this matter possibility of the opposition to work to benefit the former president (PL).
Behind the scenes, government -aligned parliamentarians (PT) say that the proposal should divide the House between oppositionists and governors and tend to represent a thermometer of the house’s adhesion to those involved in the attacks of January 8, 2023 and may extend to Bolsonaro.
Gaspar is considered a scholarship and acts strongly in opposition to the Lula administration. Recently, he was one of the.
Ramagem became a defendant for the Federal Supreme Court on charges of integrating, as well as Bolsonaro, the central core of a criminal organization accused of attempted coup after Lula’s victory in the 2022 presidential.
As he is a parliamentary, graduated in December 2022, the Court notified Congress after receiving the complaint. The Constitution provides that the House may suspend criminal proceedings against deputies for crimes committed after diploma.
Chamber’s analysis should be limited to the crimes that would have occurred after this period. Congress has no power to suspend all criminal action.
The proposal to suspend the action against ramage begins to be analyzed at the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) and then goes to the House Plenary. The House has up to 45 days to vote on the proposal.
The President of the Commission, Paulo Azi (União Brasil-BA), made Alfredo Gaspar official in the rapporteur of the Ramagem case last week. Azi said to Sheet That other parliamentarians were sought to take over the proposal, but declined, on the grounds that this is a “sensitive theme.”
He stated that Gaspar is an “experienced person with legal preparation” to analyze the issue, as the parliamentarian was an attorney general of Alagoas. The text should be voted on in the board by the end of this month.
“He will make an exempt assessment of the case. I asked if he was willing to assume responsibility with balance and exemption. I can’t be defining the choices [de relatoria] Seeing whether a deputy is a ruling or opposition, because we do not leave the place. I want to escape the polarization, “said Azi.
The president of the CCJ said that the analysis of the branch case cannot be compared to the amnesty proposal in Congress. “This project is already very guiding the national political life. We will not put more gasoline in this,” he said.
Sought, Gaspar said he still needs to analyze the content of the suspension request before issuing any positioning. He said he recognized that “inevitably” the matter will gain political weight, but said that this will not influence his analysis. “I will do a technical and careful job.”
Centrão names heard by the report questioned the choice of the deputy for the task. An ally of the mayor (Republicans-PB) said a “more moderate” name could generate less internal noise.
There is an evaluation between parliamentarians that Gaspar’s choice already indicates a setback for the STF. Without expressive voting in the House this year, pocket leaders want to take advantage of the branching case to apply a defeat to the Supreme – and thus signal the force of opposition to agenda against the court.
Three court ministers stated, under reserve, that the House can use its power to stop part of the criminal action against branching to try to rise the lawsuit against the central core of the coup plot.
The practical result of the Bolsonarist action, however, is considered null and void. There is an assessment that branch can continue to be responsible for the five crimes of which it is accused even if the House has its criminal action, as the acts performed by the deputy remain in the proceedings before the diploma.
The PT leader in the House, (RJ), asking the Court to formally clarify which crimes attributed to branch were committed before and after its diploma.
With the Supreme’s response, the PT tries to overthrow the PL thesis to suspend criminal action against the parliamentarian.
Lindbergh states that this proposal is “another aberration” of the opposition. “They want to rise the trial of Bolsonaro and the main denounced for the attempted coup. Knowing the degree of this class will certainly propose the locking of all criminal action,” he said.
PL leader (RJ), in turn, said he believed that the approval of the matter will have impacts on the process as a whole. “I have no doubt that, with the approval of the request, this whole inquiry will be locked in full. If the Constitution in Brazil is valid, and due process of law has value, the whole process will be paralyzed.”
He rejects any relationship between the amnesty project and this action. “Amnesty is a popular agenda today, from the people, just see social networks, the manifestations. The resource of the branch is ‘internal corporis’, it concerns parliamentarians.”
