The first class of (Supreme Federal Court) rejected on Tuesday (22) the five initial allegations of six more accused of involvement in the 2022 coup plot.
For the ministers, there is no impediment of ministers or (Attorney General of the Republic), and there are no problems in concluding the Lieutenant Colonel award-winning agreement, access to evidence or processing of the case by the First Class.
As in the judgment of the central core complaint, only the preliminary competence of the Supreme was not unanimous. The minister once again kept a position on the matter. For him, the case should be tried by the lower instances and, being in the Supreme Court, by the full plenary.
The collegiate on Tuesday analyzes that of the alleged attempt of coup against the winning plate of the 2022 elections, (PT) and ().
The session was suspended late in the morning, and the trial will resume in the afternoon with the vote of the merits of the complaint, when the Court will decide whether the accused will be made defendants.
(former member of the Ministry of Justice), (former international presidential advisor), (former president of the Presidency), (former member of the Ministry of Justice), (former executive secretary of the General Secretariat of Presidency) and (former director general of the Federal Highway Police) are targets of the complaint in core 2 and will be able to respond to criminal proceedings in the Supreme.
They become defendants, if the complaint is accepted for five crimes: attempt to abolish the Democratic Rule of Law, coup, armed criminal organization, qualified damage and deterioration of listed heritage.
Overall, the preliminaries raised by the defenses were similar to those of the first nucleus.
The so -called preliminary so -called, judged at Tuesday’s session, are the arguments based on procedural matters to be analyzed before the judgment of the PGR complaint the receipt itself. That is, before the evaluation if the evidence of materiality and authorship pointed out by the accusation are sufficient to make the accused defendants.
Moraes stated that much of the irregularities pointed out have already been discussed and removed. One is the question spoken by several lawyers of lack of access to gross material that originated the evidence cited by the prosecution.
“The tests attached were used in the same way by the PF and PGR. It was said that they would be versions of the STF Secretariat. Unless the defense proves that the STF Secretariat defrauded evidence, it is a dust statement. It is an allegation without any foundation,” said the minister.
Bolsonaro and 7 others were made defendants a month ago as members of the central core of the coup attempt planning.
The first class of the Supreme Court analyzes whether the PGR complaint has sufficient evidence of criminal practice and the involvement of each of the accused.
In the judgment of the complaint against the so -called central core, the collegiate also denied five preliminaries raised by the accused’s lawyers, such as the nullity of the award -winning collaboration and the case to the Supreme Plenary.
Regarding ICD’s denunciation, the magistrates agreed that the validity of the collaboration may be discussed after a possible receipt of the complaint.
