The (Federal Supreme Court) resumes this Friday (25) the judgment of, woman who during January 8. She is responsible for other crimes related to the 2023 coup attacks.
The minister announced that he will present a divergent vote, with a penalty less than the 14 years suggested by. The defining vote of the trial must be given by the minister.
Carmen has been following Moraes in all votes related to January 8 – if in the highest penalties, 17 of years, or in the smallest, 1 year. The trend, according to a minister heard by SheetIt is that the minister’s position remains and Deborah is convicted. The trial will be virtual, scheduled to end May 6.
Ministers Alexandre de Moraes and were the only ones to deposit their votes before the trial was interrupted by Luiz Fux. The two recommended to condemn Deborah to 14 years in prison for crimes of attempted abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup, qualified damage against public assets, deterioration of the overturned assets and armed criminal association.
The last member of the first class of the Supreme is the minister, president of the board. He defends in all processes a penalty less than that suggested by Moraes.
In the case of Deborah, the tendency is for Zanin to vote for the conviction to 11 years in prison, according to a minister of. This is the level that the president of the First Class has suggested to all accused who have proven to have participated in the acts of 8 January, but did not break anything during the attacks.
If the divergent votes of Zanin and Fux are confirmed, the tiebreaker will be up to Cármen Lucia. Three members of the Supreme told the Sheetunder reserve, the chances of voting of Dino and Moraes are minimal.
Deborah’s case is exploited by pockets in the offensive by the amnesty of the convicts for attacks on the headquarters of the powers. Allies of () try to raise the thesis that the woman only peered the statue with a lipstick and should not be condemned.
The accusation of the (Attorney General’s Office) against Deborah, however, considers the individual action of the accused and the multitudent action-a concept of criminal law that refers to crimes committed by a turmoil in turmoil.
The Attorney’s Office understands that, in this type of crime, each person who acted in the attack on the headquarters of powers had the same goal: to force the Armed Forces to give a coup against Lula (PT).
Following this thesis, he asks Deborah’s conviction not because she wrote the phrase “lost, Mané.” For the PGR, the sentence would be because the woman participated in the attack on powers and encouraged a democratic rupture.
Minister Luiz Fux has announced that he would review Deborah’s process because he thinks some penalties imposed on the reports of January 8 are excessively high.
“We judge under violent emotion after checking the January 8 tragedy. I went to my former globe, that the minister was my vice president, I saw burnt papers, burnt papers. But I think the judges in her life always have to reflect on errors and hits,” Fux said at the end of March.
The minister said that “under Toga beats a man’s heart” and defended the need for the Supreme Ministers to have the “ability to reflect.”
“Minister Alexandre, in his work, explained the conduct of each of the people. And I confess that on certain occasions I come across an exacerbated penalty. And that was why, giving satisfaction to you, that I asked view of this case. I want to analyze the context in which this lady was,” he said
As Sheet He showed, Fux’s review aimed to identify the circumstances in which Deborah was. One of the focuses was during the attacks.
The investigation of the PGR denunciation, however, do not bring evidence of the invasion of Deborah to public buildings.
The main evidence of the hairdresser’s participation in the scammer acts was a morphological correspondence report made by the PF. Papilloscopists in the corporation used a system to compare photos of January 8 with an image of it in the police database.
Deborah was transferred to house arrest on March 28. She was detained at the Rio Claro Women’s Resocialization Center, in the interior of, two years ago.
The flexibility of the arrest was authorized by Moraes after the minister denying nine requests for freedom to Deborah.
Moraes argued in the decision that Deborah was arrested for two years – one sixth of the possible sentence of 14 years suggested by the minister. She has a minor child and is responsible for the child’s care, and the minister considered the situation.
In a statement to the Supreme Court, Debora Rodrigues apologized for participating in the acts of January 8 and said she chopped the statue carried out by the “heat of the situation”.
“When I came across the movement, I had no idea the good [valor] financial and symbolic of the statue. When I was there I already had a person doing the graffiti. Missed maybe some malice on my part, because he started writing and said: ‘I have the very ugly lyrics, girl, can you help me write?’. And then I kept doing the writing of the phrase said by the minister [Luís Roberto] Barroso, “he said.
