Nuria Ruiz Tobarra, the judge who investigates the Dana who last October left 228 dead in the province of Valencia, rejects that the criminal responsibility of the tragedy should focus on the mayors and insists on pointing to the “autonomic administration” as an authority that had to manage the crisis, according to a resolution notified this Friday.
Despite considering that “the fault of the first mayor must be ruled out, the instructor has agreed to cite the mayors of the Valencian municipalities of Utiel and Algemesí, Ricardo Gabaldón and José Javier Sánchís Bretones, both of the PP. And also in the same condition to the Head of Climatology of the Spanish Meteorology Agency (Aemet) in the Valencian Community, José Ángel Núñez, together with three workers of the Júcar Hydrographic Confederation (CHJ), which depends on the Ministry for Ecological Transition.
In her last car battery, the instructor rejects that emergency calls be requested from the National Police, the Civil Guard and local police. And that an expert report on the “alleged falsehood” of a photo that the Valencian Executive facilitated the Court in which the president of the Valencian Government, Carlos Mazón, of the PP, crossed the door of the Cecopi- the Emergency Organ of the Generalitat that met on October 29, at 20.28 hours, 17 minutes after its Executive, after its Executive, after its executive, after its executive, sent the executive, was He arrived when there were dozens of killed people, missing and trapped in low floors and garages.
The instructor has also rejected the request of Citizens, who exercises the popular accusation, of requesting information on the official vehicles that used the two charges of Mazón accused: the former advice of Justice and Interior Salome Salome Pradas and who was his number two during the flood, Emilio Argüeso. The formation claimed the name of the drivers and the itinerary that these former positions followed- they were ceased by the president four weeks after the catastrophe- as well as information about their agendas. “The issue lies in the lack of decisions aimed at alerting the population and, for this, an analysis of the official agenda of said investigated is not exhaustive,” justifies the magistrate. Ruiz Tobarra returns, thus, to focus on the responsibility of the delay of the sending of the massive Mobile SMS to inform the population of the magnitude of the tragedy. A message that, if sent before, according to the instructor, would have saved lives.
