Maxim Parilov served as the main cook of the section in the Russian armed forces. On March November 20, 2024, when he was part of the invasive forces in Ukraine, he spent time drinking vodka, which he also supported by marijuana. Late at night, he decided to make a rest of the rest – shooting from a submachine gun. Night shots attracted the commander’s attention. He came to Parill to remind him that it is forbidden to drink hard alcohol and take drugs in the territory where fighting is running.
Parilov responded in his own way: he pointed the submachine gun at the battalion and fired. The commander got three interventions in the head and died on the spot. Another eight shots chef fired into his dead body from the immediate vicinity.
Relax by vodka
The case on Monday (May 4) informed the Russian daily, who writes that on Monday, Parilova Court of Appeal sentenced to 17 years in a criminal colony with the strictest regime and also lost the rank of Sergeant.
Parilov became part of the invasion of November 2, 2023 in the framework of mobilization as the so -called. Kontraktnik. Until then, he did not work in the armed forces. That evening, with his colleague, they relaxed in Zemlanka in an unspecified place in Ukraine.
“At first they drank vodka, then they” arrived “marijuana. At three o’clock at night, the chief cook of the section decided to shoot from the submachine gun Kalashnikov, who belonged to his colleague.
The Battorek admonished the couple, as it is forbidden to drink hard alcohol and take drugs in the territory of the “special military operation”, as the Russians call the invasion of Ukraine. Then he pointed the parillies at the commander and fired.
Witnesses claimed that the chef woke up with the words: “I demonstrated the battalion, let’s dig.”
He appealed, failed
When they found the body of the commander in the forest, Maxim was detained. According to the minutes, he still had symptoms of drunkenness if the murder was admitted voluntarily, writes Kommersant.
Soldier for the deed in mid -December 2024 court of first instance, but appealed. His lawyer claimed that this was not a fair judgment, because the whole case is only at the testimony of his colleague, with whom he sipped and confessing the defendant that evening. According to the lawyer, he could do him on the basis of physical and mental pressure, as evidenced by several injuries on the body of Parilov. In addition, the defendant’s imprints were not found in the trigger and did not have traces of gunpowder on his hands.
According to the Court of Appeal, the lawyer’s claims that the use of unauthorized interrogation methods was not proven.
