The imposition of high duties on imported products will stimulate the US economy: the US president insists on his belief, which was also a key election commitment. However, in recent days, the US president has been adopting lower tones, as the who preached on the planet does not bring the expected results.
At every opportunity, as in his interview with the NBC network on Sunday (4/5), Trump blames responsibility for the state of the economy, which does not bloom, in his predecessor, the Democratic President. But because Biden cannot be responsible for the stagnation of the economy, Trump and his staff argue that America is going through a transitional period that will follow growth.
Until then, they have been asking the Americans to have patience and sacrifices. “Girls can have three dolls rather than thirty” and “use five pencils and not two hundred and fifty,” Trub told NBC.
Restraint
Addressed to American consumers. This recommendation contradicts its pre -election announcements but also in a rupture with the traditional American presidential rhetoric aimed at lifting citizens. According to the Washington Post newspaper, President Herbert Hoover promised “a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage in America”, President Ronald Reagan was talking about “in the morning in America” while President Richard. The temperament now recommended by President Trump to American citizens is also in full mismatch with his own, luxurious lifestyle.
Ideological coverage in sacrifices
To reinforce his argument, Trump is trying to give and what Americans are called upon to do. In recent years, the ideological stream that Americans should not only look forward to the acquisition of material goods, because in life there are other important things, gaining ground in the conservative and far -right US circles.
Speaking in the Washington Post, Michael Strene, head of economic studies at Think Tank American Enterprise Institute, argues that in the US right, more and more, rapid economic growth is not worth it if it is going to cause cultural turmoil, that it is overwhelming and overwhelming.
Regardless of how long these arguments are, it is clear, Streen concludes, that it is not the responsibility of the US president or the government to decide whether the Americans must focus on the development of their souls and not the stimulation of the economy.
