Leaders of center and leftist parties want to avoid a new crisis with the (Supreme Court) by maneuvering in favor of the deputy (-RJ) who could benefit (PL).
The president of the house, (-PB), said in an interview with the newspaper Valor Econômico on Friday (9) that he expected the Supreme Court to maintain the decision of the House-which, hours later, was not confirmed with.
Nevertheless, leaders say, in private, that they do not see room for an answer without appearing like a new chapter of crisis between powers. They also evaluate that it is sufficient to lock part of the criminal action safeguarding only branch.
The tone is still cautious. A center leader said that if Motta is sensible, he will avoid the crisis climbing. But as he has conducted here, he gives a breach to be widely charged by the opposition.
The approval of the report was seen as a Motta gesture for the opposition, which embittered defeat by the shelter of the bill that grants amnesty to those arrested by the scammers of January 8. Especially by the way it happened, in a rapid vote in plenary and without instruments that could postpone the discussion.
Bolsonarist deputies, in turn, complained about the Court’s understanding, even if it was priced. PL leader Sostenes Cavalcante (RJ) went to social networks to charge a response from Motta.
“The majority has just been formed in the first class of the Supreme Court to overthrow part of the sustainment approved by 315 deputies in plenary. A minister is overlapping the will of the whole House. With the word, President Hugo Motta. Will defend the sovereignty of Parliament or watch silent?”
PT leader Lindbergh Farias (RJ) celebrated the result of the court. “Most form and overthrows ‘Amnesty Train’. Bolsonaro and his generals will have to answer for their crimes. The House cannot lock the entire criminal action. It is illegal and unconstitutional,” he said.
Motta’s allies say it is necessary to wait for the political developments of the episode, but bet that he will not be interested in extending him, turning into a new crisis with the Supreme. The House may also appeal with declaration embargoes, which was not yet decided.
When he took office as president of the house, at the beginning of the year, one of his priorities was the distemounting between the powers, especially the resolution of the
As approved in the House, the report could lock the criminal action benefiting other defendants, as well as branch, such as Braga Netto and Bolsonaro. The Supreme Court had already told the house that there was no constitutional prediction for such a broad understanding.
This Friday (9), the first class of the majority formed by the overthrow of the maneuver of the House. The position of the Supreme confronts the decision of the deputies to support all the criminal action against branch and confirms that the action of the congressmen has no power to paralyze the case against the other defendants, such as Bolsonaro.
The minister, rapporteur of the case, voted against the stoppage of all criminal action against the deputy and, in the early evening, had already been accompanied by the ministers, and. The vote of.
The trial takes place in the Virtual Plenary of the First Class and has a deadline to end until next Tuesday (13).
“The requirements of the very personal and temporal character, provided for in the constitutional text, are clear and expressed, in the sense of the impossibility of application of this immunity to non -parliamentary corridors and criminal offenses before diploma,” Moraes said in his vote.
The minister states that the Constitution provides no other situation in which the legislature may suspend the judicial activity of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the attribution of the chamber in the branch case is limited.
Motta’s allies saw Flávio Dino’s vote as the hardest. He says that the House, in trying to suspend the whole process, surpasses its constitutional attributions and tries to promote “improper interference in a lawsuit of exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court”.
“Only in tyrannies can a state branch concentrate in your hands the power to pass laws, elaborate the budget and execute it directly, make criminal judgments or arbitrarily paralyze them-all this supposedly without any kind of legal control,” says the magistrate.
