Federal Deputies Alfredo Gaspar (União Brasil-AL) and Sâmia Bomfim (PSOL-SP), discussed, Friday (09), in The Great Debate (From Monday to Friday, at 11 pm), about the possible friction that may generate with the House of Representatives the decision of most ministers of the First Class of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) to partially suspend the criminal action against Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ).
The first class of the STF formed a majority to keep in part in the process of the coup plan.
The decision happens after the House of Representatives decides to completely suspend the action.
For Alfredo Gaspar, rapporteur of the opinion approved by the deputies who defended the suspension of the whole process against branch, the position of the STF hits the prerogatives of the House and contrasts the choice of 305 deputies favorable to the total suspension of the action against branch.
“We have been prevented from appreciating all facts related to a parliamentary. Parliament does not admit it at all, according to Article 53 in paragraph 3, when it says it may suspend the criminal action of all crimes after diploma.”
Gaspar states that there is a great discrepancy between defendants and others for the acts of January 8.
“The Supreme Court said that the House could not observe any suspension regarding three crimes presented in the complaint, while several people in January 8 are reported by these offenses, such as the one who peered with lipstick that monument in front of the Supreme Court. It is a very large incongruity,” he explains.
For Mrs Samia Bomfim, parliamentarians who returned to suspend the action against branch already knew that there would be a contestation of the judiciary and that it would, of course, be overthrown in the STF.
“In addition to there is a strong controversy about this reading that the five crimes imputed to the branch would be subsequent to diploma, because we are talking about aspects when he was director of ABIN [Agência Brasileira de Inteligência]when it had not yet been graduated as a deputy, there is another report that I consider extremely severe, as well as including the ornaments. ”
The PSOL deputy states that the idea was to rid bringing of the survey of the five crimes coup and could rid other names, such as Jair Bolsonaro, Augusto Heleno, General Braga Neto and Almir Garnier.
“Everyone involved in the main core of coup and also the others, of the other seven nuclei, who are in this Supreme Court inquiry. There are those who want the conflicted climate between Congress and the Supreme Court,” he says.
The Supreme Board voted to maintain a lawsuit against the deputy for three crimes: violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law; coup of state; and criminal organization.
Thus, accusations would be annulled by the crimes of qualified damage and deterioration of listed heritage.
The amendment occurred because, according to the manifestation of the Attorney General’s Office, these offenses were committed after branching, when the Constitution allows the suspension of criminal actions against parliamentarians.
