Minister sees speaks of the deputy as isolated and without normative effect and says that public resources cannot be controlled by parties
Minister Flávio Dino, of the Supreme Federal Court), said on Thursday (15.MAI.2025) that the deputy’s declaration (PL-RJ) about the binding of parliamentary amendments to the vote of an amnesty proposal for involved in the acts of 8 January does not reflect the institutional position of the House of Representatives. According to the magistrate, the speech “It has no normative effect”.
The demonstration was made in the ADPF (argument of non -compliance with fundamental precept) 854, presented by PSOL. The party questioned the possible use of public resources as a bargaining chip to approve amnesty legislative proposals to defendants or convicted of involvement in the attacks of January 8, 2023.
Dino considered the clarifications provided by the house sufficient and stated that there “Immunities” or “Prerogatives” For a single political party to control the resources of the Union Budget.
“I consider that, at this moment, it is evidenced that –institutionally – the parliamentary house highlights that it will not allow agreements or ‘breach of agreements’ in dissonance with the work plan approved by the plenary of the Supreme Court.”
The document also deals with other measures of transparency in the use of amendments, such as the compulsory registration of the proposals for budgetary amendment and the requirement to publish minutes and documents of the admissibility of amendments Committee on the Congress website.
Speech of Sostenes
The PL leader in the House told the newspaper that he threatened to break a pact with the president of the Casa Baixa, (Republicans-PB), as part of a strategy to press him to guide the project that gives amnesty to the prisoners and investigated on January 8.
Sostenes said he has an agreement with Motta that establishes that 30% of the total value of commission amendments will be with the party that commands it and the other 70% are distributed by the mayor to other acronyms.
According to the former president’s party leader (PL), the acronym is entitled to about $ 6.5 billion in commission amendments and would threaten to violate the pact to make the project advance in the House.
“If it takes an extreme measure, we will disrespect this agreement and manage 100% of the value of the committees we preside over, dividing the amount among the deputies who voted for the urgency of amnesty.”these.
According to Dino, the statements could indicate that the Congress that establishes rules for the destination of congressmen amendments and the plan of the legislature approved by the Supreme, who undertakes to identify deputies and senators who indicate and support resources.
