The coalition party Voice-SD or Minister of Health Kamil Šaško (Voice-SD) will not support the proposal that Slovakia will reject the so-called. pandemic agreement. Shaško said it. Pointed out that Agreement does not restrict the sovereignty of any country and does not take freedom in decidingwhat will be done in the case of a pandemic.
“I or voice-SD will not support the proposal that Slovakia is demonstrative and perhaps the only one to reject the pandemic agreement. Such a step is much more political marketing as a real health protection of people in Slovakia. The only thing we achieve is that the world will look at us through our fingers and accordingly in crisis moments it may also be treated, ”he noted in an opinion provided by the TASR from the Communication Department of the Ministry of Health.
The shashko pointed out that Pandemic Agreement is not a global regulationbut by an agreement of almost all states of the world, As the best and together to face the threat of another pandemic. Explained that he sets out mechanisms as they will countries to exchange information about new viruses or pathogens more effectively, and supports the states ready stocks, trained people and plans. “If, after all, to some pandemic, for the sake of, it happened, Pandemic Agreement helps countries to share information and at the same time to ensure that people, of course, most importantly, are voluntarily, they got quickly to the necessary medicines or tests, ” said.
He stressed that the Pandemic Agreement does not take freedom to decide how to proceed in the case of a pandemic. “It does not restrict the sovereignty of any country and therefore not even Slovakia. But it gives us a better overview, enough information and the necessary support. For every single person in Slovakia means the possibility Better protection of his health, less chaos and less unnecessary restrictions in the case of a pandemic. It is sharing information with the most advanced countries in the world like Switzerland or Nordic States of Europe, ” noted.
According to Šaška Slovakia, the Pandemic of Covid-19 has shown that when it comes to human health, recognized experts should take precedence. Criticized that Prime Minister Igor Matovič at the time of the pandemic invented various “atomics”. “However, thousands of people have paid the highest prize – their lives and health,” for this eccentric complacency, “ added. He regrets that the Plenipotentiary of the Slovak Government for verifying the process of management and management of resources during the Covid-19 pandemic Peter Kotlár has not yet submitted a compulsory material to evaluate the management of the pandemic during the government of Matovic and Eduard Heger. “To clearly show us which solutions were fine that were unnecessary and which were dangerous to life,” argued.
The head of the Health Department is convinced that Slovakia should not be played at the pandemics at all costs of the hero who goes against the whole world. “We did it once in Matovic and it did not go well, on the contrary. Much greater certainty to people in their health gives In both sides, cooperation with the best, cooperation based on science and facts, ” added. Declared that they will always be the first place for him Interests of patients, health professionals and Slovak health care. “And I will continue to defend these interests with all the forces,” he said.
In Geneva, Switzerland, it will be from 19. to 27. May 78. The meeting of the World Health Assembly. On the wording of the pandemic treaty aimed at better preparation for the pandemic and the fight against them has been discussed for several years. The Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) agreed on its version in April. Among other things, the proposal confirms the sovereignty of countries in addressing issues of public health within their borders.
Already on Friday (May 16), the government decided per rollam on the attitude of Slovakia to the vote on the so -called. pandemic agreement. She has not yet published the conclusion. Prime Minister Robert Fico (Smer-SD) has already informed that there are different opinions about the agreement in the coalition, no Direction-SD considers it “absolutely unacceptable”.