The (Federal Supreme Court) says that it is not expected to analyze a writ of mandamus presented by the New Party to ensure that after the Court decides to veto this type of coverage.
The Supreme Court veto covers sessions scheduled to take place from May 19 to June 2, a period to listen to the witnesses of the criminal action.
Photographers and cameramen will not be able to accredit themselves to accompany, and journalists will be able to watch only through a big screen. Abraji (Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism).
Last Monday (19), he presented him with an injunction with injunction to ensure full press access to hearings.
According to the Supreme Regiment, the Court has 48 hours to make the “initial processing” of requests submitted, including assessment (numbering) and distribution to a minister.
Until Thursday (22), however, the piece had only received a number, without being distributed. Sought, the Supreme Court said it is not expected to analyze the subtitle request.
“The STF’s decision to prohibit the recording of hearings is another attack on press freedom and the law of society to information,” said the new leader in the House, Marcel Van Hattem (Novo-RS). “There is no plausible justification for hiding testimonials in a process of enormous public relevance. What is underway is an authoritarian climb that tries to silence journalists and control the narrative. In short, this is censorship.”
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
