Now that the Constitution and Justice Commission of approved its extinction, along with a future union adjustment table at all levels for the executive and legislative powers.
It is a desire for much of the political world practically since its approval in 1997, and which has been gaining supporters over the years in which there were 14 national, state and municipal claims under the rule of renewal of mandates.
There are basically two to end reelection and for presidents, governors, mayors, senators, deputies and councilors to be chosen at one date.
In the first case, reelection would not have worked, it would facilitate the abuse of political power. In the second, elections every two years would make the process more expensive and rise the environment.
None of the allegations are supported by the objective light of the facts. In short, two of them: abuses in the political-electoral system date long before 1997; And nothing more faced the process than the illegalities committed at the time of business donations and then with the institution of the billionaire public campaign funding.
Rulers will always work to elect the successor. Lyciciously when honest and that way consecrated by, who proud to have broken Banespa, but elected governor of Sao Paulo in 1990. And so many others did when there was no reelection.
I downtly spend space contradicting the argument that less and not and therefore return to the theme of the renewal of mandates.
There is no irrefutable proof that worst rulers have been elected since 1997 compared to the previous period. Instead of ending an voter right, why not improve the instrument? For example, forcing executive heads for reelection candidates to move away from positions six months earlier.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
