On Monday (26), Moraes was chosen rapporteur of the case because he already conducted investigations that are related to the case, such as the fake news inquiry and the criminal action that investigates an attempt to coup d’état
The request for investigation against (PL-SP) has aroused, in opposition parliamentarians, a feeling that the request was ready and that the piece presented today is the original of when the Attorney General, Paulo Gonet, and the Supreme Court Minister, Alexandre de Moraes, denied the apprehension of Eduardo Bolsonaro’s passport and the arrest of the parliamentary. The request for seizure of the parliamentarian’s passport was made by Deputy Lindenberg Farias (PT) and Rogério Correia (PT). Deputies heard by this reserved column point out that the request was ready, but only now has been deceived.
Eduardo Bolsonaro is in the United States and has not guaranteed whether he will return to Brazil to resume his term in July 2025. On Monday (26), Moraes was chosen rapporteur of the case because he also conducted investigations that are related to the case, such as the fake news survey and the criminal action that investigates an attempted coup d’état in the country.
According to Attorney General Paulo Gonet, the parliamentarian has used a “intimidating tone” to try to disrupt the technical trial of criminal action against former President Jair Bolsonaro (PL) for the attempted coup d’état. With the permanence of Eduardo Bolsonaro in the United States, the minister determined that his testimony could be made in a written manner.
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mauro Vieira, will have the responsibility to indicate which Brazilian diplomatic authorities in the United States may receive the clarifications requested by PGR.
*This text does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the young Pan.
