The discussion opened by the president of, (Brazil-AP Union), with ministers of the (Supreme Federal Court) to the January 8 scammers lost traction and to be presented.
Authorities involved in the articulation state that the discussion was emptied by the pockets themselves, as the opposition lowered the pressure by amnesty and began to aim at other issues, such as the creation of one at the INSS (National Institute of Social Security).
For the group, the movement made by Alcolumbre served to demonstrate that the opposition was not concerned with relieving the situation of ordinary people, who, but that of the former president (PL), who would not be reached by changes in this new proposal.
As soon as the discussion went public, Bolsonaro’s allies rejected an alternative and promised to insist on the broad amnesty project to those involved. The former president himself in defense of a “humanitarian amnesty” earlier this month.
Supreme ministers consulted by alcohumbre in recent weeks have tried to make it clear that they would not resist such an initiative by Congress, but they would not endorse the speech that the court committed excesses in the application of penalties.
According to them, any change in the legislation would be a recognition of parliamentarians that the penalties were fixed on high levels and that the Supreme only applied the laws previously prepared by Congress itself.
According to reports, ministers also told Alcolumbre that the best way to terminate the insistent request for amnesty would be to wait for the penalties to begin and analyze the situation of prisoners on a case -by -case basis.
Rapporteur of just over 1,400 inquiries related to January 8, the minister decided to take 33 prisoners-32 from them from March 28, when Deborah, one of the pro-administration symbols, received the benefit of house arrest.
The number includes convicted with a final judgment that have health problems and other accusations that have not even been tried.
In parallel to this, members of the Supreme Court evaluated that the amnesty choir had gained breath because there was a vacuum of debates in Congress on other matters.
After months of doldrums on, Alcolumbre printed a higher pace in the house and put in vote as, a complex project that had been dragging on for over 20 years in Congress.
Other projects of greater relevance have also been approved in recent days, such as the extension of racial quotas in public service and restrictions on BETS advertising.
In the same line, the president of, (Republicans-PB), created a working group of the administrative reform and in INSS retirement and pensions.
A person along with the elaboration of the alternative to Amnesty states that Alcolumbre brought together different ideas, but did not closed the text of a bill. An elaborate draft, provided for three changes in the so -called Democratic Rule Defense Law.
The main change involved creating a new criminal type to punish those who were influenced by a crowd to perform acts against the democratic rule of law – which would relieve the penalties of what they see as the “mass of maneuver” that vandalized the headquarters of powers but did not plan.
Alcolumbre even consulted some senators, such as Sergio Moro (União Brasil-PR) and Alessandro Vieira (MDB-SE), author of a proposal that would also lead to the reduction of the penalties, but there was no creation of any working group, as advertised weeks ago.
The discussions about the text were concentrated in the former president of Senate Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG), who is a lawyer, and advisors.
