The (Federal Supreme Court) scheduled for next Wednesday (4) the resumption of the trial of the-and whose analysis was.
The minister, author of the request for more time for analysis, returned the processes to the plenary on Monday (26). This Wednesday (28), the President of the Court, Minister, defined the date for the return of the subject to the discussion.
So far, there are three votes from the rapporteurs of both resources and, and Barroso, who has asked for first sight.
Toffoli voted for the unconstitutionality of Article 19, which provides that networks can only be ordered to pay compensation for their users after breach of court order.
Currently, the only exceptions provided for by law are cases of copyright violations and unprecedented nudity images, in which extrajudicial notification are sufficient.
Toffoli proposed as a new general rule that platforms will be held responsible from the moment they are notified. It creates, however, as moderate or recommended content by networks. In addition, he created a series of extra duties for the platforms, which Fux did not enter.
Fux voted to expand the hypotheses in which platforms can be condemned by their users’ content and argued that networks must have an obligation to monitor actively illicit content.
Already the president opened the divergence and argued that the current rule is declared only partially unconstitutional.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
