The lawyer stated that the NO (National Council of Justice) is only the “first step”. He claims that it is necessary to review all acts of the magistrate in the conduct of the no.
“Judge Bretas’ retirement decision is the first step. We need to advance and review all the acts of abuse by him and prosecutors. We need to remember that Bretas illegally ordered 806 searches and seizures, 70 temporary arrests and 264 preventive arrests, and that the prosecutor has reported 887 people,” he said.
Nythalmar also criticized what he called the “disbelief campaign.” He signed an award-winning collaboration agreement with the Attorney General’s Office (PGR) that was not approved for lack of evidence of crime. However, his testimonials were used in disciplinary process against Bretas.
“Four years ago, I was the victim of an illegal search and since then I have been suffering a disbelief campaign orchestrated by members of the extinct Lava Jato task force.”
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
Your signature can be further
Do you already know the advantages of being a subscriber of Folha? In addition to having access to reports and columns, you have exclusive newsletters (). You can also download our free app from or to receive alerts from the main news of the day. Your signature helps us do independent and quality journalism. Thanks!
Your signature is worth a lot
More than 180 reports and analyzes published every day. A team with over 200 columnists and bloggers. Professional journalism that supervises the government, conveys profitable and inspiring news, opposes the intolerance of social networks and traces a clear line between truth and lie. How much does it cost to help produce this content?
